Commentary: As going gets tough, BLP proves faithful to first love
What a difference a year or two can make. Back when the market was booming, Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP) seemed to go out of its way to stress its corporate ambitions while downplaying its undoubted strengths in the booming real estate market. Now that the property sector has been thrown into a deep slump and most major legal players have made property lawyers redundant, BLP has not only so far resisted swinging the axe, but has just made up no fewer than five real estate partners.
April 29, 2009 at 10:34 PM
3 minute read
As rivals pare down in real estate, BLP is standing firm in the market
What a difference a year or two can make. Back when the market was booming, Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP) seemed to go out of its way to stress its corporate ambitions while downplaying its undoubted strengths in the booming real estate market. Now that the property sector has been thrown into a deep slump and most major legal players have made property lawyers redundant, BLP has not only so far resisted swinging the axe, but has just made up no fewer than five real estate partners.
Even for a firm renowned for property, it is a bold move and could not contrast more strongly with rivals, where a string of comparable firms have drastically cut back on property promotions. Even if this year's promotions contrast with the 2008 round when no real estate partners were made up at BLP, four core real estate partners and one further planning specialist is an impressive tally.
The City promotions will take BLP's core London real estate practice – excluding construction and planning – to 26 partners from 1 May, up from 23 at present after the retirement this year of Ian Lynch. This represents a lot of mouths to feed – even for a firm such as BLP, which is known for its hefty junior equity rank – but particularly when no-one expects work levels to increase significantly before the end of the year.
Still, the consensus among rivals is that, despite torrid market conditions, BLP has had a decent property recession, certainly better than some competitors. Internal indications are that BLP will grind out property revenues in 2009 roughly on par with 2008, when around 35% of its £185m turnover came from property – quite a result, given the wider slump in the market over that period.
Real estate head Robert MacGregor (pictured) stresses the decision to expand now does not mean that the firm has escaped the pain that rivals and clients are feeling (indeed, BLP seems almost embarrassed that hard-pressed clients wouldn't approve of its reluctance to cut staff). But he does concede that BLP is positioning itself for the future of a long-term property revival and as a firm that unambiguously sees itself as a leader in real estate. The promotions also need to be seen against a backdrop of international expansion, with BLP's ambitious launch in Russia, a just-signed deal that will hand the firm a further 18 lawyers in the sector.
In this sense, BLP's stance, counter-intuitive as it may seem, is perfectly timed given that two groups of rivals are scaling back their property commitments. The first group are top City firms downscaling property to focus on the most profitable work and, second, national law firms that were opportunistically diverted into property as the credit boom inflated the practice area.
As MacGregor comments: "We set our stall out clearly three or four years ago to say that we aren't just going to cherry-pick the biggest deals. We are going to stay deep in the real estate market and, for significant clients, we will do all of their work – from the most difficult to the most straightforward."
It's hard to find fault with those sentiments. Could it be time for a reinvention of the traditional City property firm?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Combative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump
4 minute readLaw Firms 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250