Pim Bertels: A new Dutch market demands new skills from advisers
In 2008 the Benelux marketplace was dominated by the global financial crisis. During the second half of the year the crisis spilled over to the real economy. As a result of the significant shortage in financing, as well as the reduced trust in the markets, both the number of strategic mergers and acquisitions and private equity buyouts decreased considerably, compared with 2007.
April 29, 2009 at 08:03 PM
4 minute read
In 2008 the Benelux marketplace was dominated by the global financial crisis. During the second half of the year the crisis spilled over to the real economy. As a result of the significant shortage in financing, as well as the reduced trust in the markets, both the number of strategic mergers and acquisitions and private equity buyouts decreased considerably, compared with 2007.
The year 2008 marked the tail end of the golden era of Benelux real estate tender sales, characterised by large real estate portfolios. The reduction in the amount of available debt financing has affected the Benelux markets. Many real estate fund suppliers have been forced to drastically cut back their activities in 2008. As for institutional investors, in 2008, the real estate component in their total investment package rose too much due to falling share prices, which also led to fewer real estate purchases. Several cases of fraud have had a further negative effect on real estate. Changing market conditions require greater creativity.
In contrast, the Dutch energy sector has been very active thanks to new legislation that came into effect in mid-2007. As a result, the commercial business of the utility companies has to split off from the networks. A consolidation of the Dutch energy market has been underway since then, leading to ongoing M&A activity. There has also been a flurry of activity in the upstream energy market.
In 2008, Belgium's energy market was marked by the sale of Distrigas by GDF Suez, which was inspired by the application of the competition rules. Furthermore, the financing of projects related to renewable and sustainable energy was the subject of several cases last year.
Trends in 2009
Restructuring work is increasing. It requires a practical approach, where significant experience is coupled with the ability to draw on a broad scope of practices including tax capabilities. Corporate litigation and labour law departments have seen more work coming their way.
The Benelux financing market, following the global trend, has seen an increase in asset-based lending. In addition, a more proactive attitude towards refinancing is required, and it is expected that debt capital markets are to play a larger role. Law firms with strong asset-based as well as debt capital markets capabilities are expected to benefit from these trends.
Moreover, law firms notice an increased anxiety related to directors' liability. Directors need to know they do not violate financial assistance rules when taking over other companies. Furthermore, the M&A market is characterised by several trade sales. There may be opportunities for buyers with access to funding, but it remains true that financial institutions review each project critically. Joint ventures and strategic alliances are gaining popularity.
Important amendments to Dutch corporate law are expected. The rules in respect of the Dutch private limited liability company will be relaxed allowing, for example, a one-tier board, reduced capital requirements upon incorporation and elimination of the financial assistance prohibition. Dutch partnership law is also due to be revamped, allowing partnerships with legal personality. These amendments are expected to favour the competitive position of the Dutch market.
Private equity and investment funds in the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Belgium have become more attractive this year, mainly due to the modernisation of existing fund regimes and the introduction of new regimes. This is a favourable development not just for fund managers and sponsors, but for investors too. The introduction of a new specialised investment fund regime for professional investors is the most important change in the last few years in Luxembourg and constitutes one aspect of Luxembourg's political drive to bring its fund regimes into line with developments in the markets. The latest improvement is a modernisation of the SICAR regime (a special regime for private equity). At the start of this year, the Dutch Government relaxed the rules regarding real estate investment institutions. In addition, the applicability of the VBI regime has also become clearer. Now Belgium, too, has introduced a new institutional fund regime.
Pim Bertels is managing partner at Loyens & Loeff.This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKMPG Moves to Provide Legal Services in the US—Now All Eyes Are on Its Big Four Peers
International Arbitration: Key Developments of 2024 and Emerging Trends for 2025
4 minute readThe Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Calculated Push Into Law Firms
5 minute read'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250