Selling BPP - always something to talk about
Well, there's never a dull moment in legal education. The quiet bits consist of ill-tempered competition between vocational educational providers and sharp-elbowed jostling to secure exclusive law firm deals, all played out against a backdrop of endless debate over educational reform. BPP.jpgAnd bringing a new element to the mix, it was announced yesterday (29 April) that the US education company Apollo Group had made a preliminary approach for BPP Holdings plc, the parent company of BPP Law School, valuing the business at £303.5m.
April 29, 2009 at 08:03 PM
2 minute read
Well, there's never a dull moment in legal education. The quiet bits consist of ill-tempered competition between vocational educational providers and sharp-elbowed jostling to secure exclusive law firm deals, all played out against a backdrop of endless debate over educational reform.
And bringing a new element to the mix, it was announced yesterday (29 April) that the US education company Apollo Group had made a preliminary approach for BPP Holdings plc, the parent company of BPP Law School, valuing the business at £303.5m.
Obviously, that doesn't mean a done deal and the statement issued by BPP's board underlines the fact that the group still has hopes of pursuing an independent strategy. Still, putting down a 70% premium to BPP's share price at the end of Tuesday (28 April) in an all-cash approach "not … subject to external financing conditionality", suggests Apollo is serious.
The question now is whether a formal offer will materialise after Apollo looks at BPP's books and if the approach will smoke out another (presumably foreign) bidder. Given BPP's clout in the UK vocational market and status as the UK's only for-profit body with degree-awarding powers, it would be a tempting prize.
Lawyers, of course, will be primarily interested in the influence of the approach on the law school. While the education market has gone through much upheaval over the last decade, BPP has clearly emerged along with the College of Law as one of two very dominant players the commercial sector.
Potentially bringing in foreign ownership for such a well-known institution could ruffle some feathers in the profession, particularly given the stronger commercial imperative in the US educational sphere, where Apollo has built a $3bn business.
Apollo would have also, in a single bound, travelled much further than Kaplan, the US education provider than has made steady but unspectacular inroads in the UK via its joint venture with Nottingham Law School. Set against that, the intense competition and unambiguously commercial drift of our legal education sector in recent years hardly suggests a major culture clash under US ownership. Nevertheless, the sizeable band of BPP-bashers, who already find it too brash and trusting, would doubtless find fresh ammunition should this institution fall to the greenback.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250