Barristers try conditional fees amid client pressure
Leading commercial sets are stepping up their use of conditional fee arrangements (CFAs) as law firms and clients increase pressure to cut counsel costs. Some of the profession's top silks and chambers are taking on cases at reduced rates in return for an uplift if the case is successful - a practice that was until recently unheard of at the commercial Bar. Addleshaw Goddard, a strong proponent of third-party litigation funding and after-the-event insurance, is also separately in talks with top sets including Brick Court, Fountain Court and Essex Court Chambers to encourage them to use CFAs. Sign-up from barristers is likely to make Addleshaws' cost-free litigation scheme more attractive to clients.
April 30, 2009 at 01:43 AM
3 minute read
Leading commercial sets are stepping up their use of conditional fee arrangements (CFAs) as law firms and clients increase pressure to cut counsel costs.
Some of the profession's top silks and chambers are taking on cases at reduced rates in return for an uplift if the case is successful – a practice that was until recently unheard of at the commercial Bar.
Addleshaw Goddard, a strong proponent of third-party litigation funding and after-the-event insurance, is also separately in talks with top sets including Brick Court, Fountain Court and Essex Court Chambers to encourage them to use CFAs. Sign-up from barristers is likely to make Addleshaws' cost-free litigation scheme more attractive to clients.
Brick Court has already separately taken on seven cases on a CFA basis this year – including one involving a silk.
Barristers at several other sets are also thought to be seriously considering CFAs.
Addleshaws litigation head Simon Twigden (pictured) commented: "A big chunk of fees in significant litigation are taken up with counsel costs. There has been a general lack of understanding and fear among barristers that CFA equates to "no win, no fee". This stigma among the commercial sets is clearing, as litigation funding methods are increasingly in demand."
He added: "More and more big names at the Bar are saying yes to a serious consideration of this. We increasingly factor this in when we make recommendations to our clients on which barristers to use."
The move sees chambers follow the lead of law firms, which have increasingly been using CFAs and other alternative fee arrangements during the economic downturn.
The interest has led litigation funder Allianz to plan a commercial litigation funding conference with No5 Chambers to be held in June.
In addition to CFAs, there is also growing momentum for chambers to move away from hourly rates through fixed fees and cost capping.
Chairman of the Chancery Bar Association, Michael Todd QC, said: "In the past we have worked to an hourly rate as that was what was previously demanded by solicitor firms and their clients. Now there is an increasing demand coming from the other direction, with clients wanting more than ever to have certainty as to what a piece of work will cost and, in certain instances, wanting fixed fees and caps where possible."
Specialist funding broker Calunius Capital founding member Mick Smith said: "It is certainly the case that the Bar is becoming more open-minded on payment arrangements. Given the increasing pressures on clients to reduce and manage their costs, there is more willingness among the Bar to work alongside solicitor firms and act on a CFA basis or consider payment methods such as fixed fees and costs capping. This is only set to increase in the economic conditions."
|Sign up for legalweek.com job alerts
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBaker & Partners, LCWP Lead on $1B Fraud Claim by Malaysia's 1MDB Against Amicorp
Apple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readBaker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Freshfields Takes on Syria's Brutal Legacy, But Will Victims Ever See Compensation?
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250