Herbert Smith sets precedent with success of retail rescue
In the same week that figures from the Insolvency Service revealed company administrations grew by more than 50% during the first three months of 2009 compared to the previous year, the rescue of troubled sports retailer JJB Sports offered a glimmer of hope for companies in difficulty.
May 06, 2009 at 10:34 PM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
While there's plenty of work for insolvency advisers, JJB offers hope of happier outcome
In the same week that figures from the Insolvency Service revealed company administrations grew by more than 50% during the first three months of 2009 compared to the previous year, the rescue of troubled sports retailer JJB Sports offered a glimmer of hope for companies in difficulty.
The rescue saw Herbert Smith take the lead role for the stricken retailer, which secured a company voluntary arrangement (CVA) with its landlords. The agreement will see landlords of around 140 closed stores give up combined annual rental income of around £15m in return for a share of a £10m pot of money. Meanwhile, landlords of those stores remaining in operation have agreed to accept monthly rental payments instead of the large quarterly bills that have forced many retailers into collapse.
Admittedly, there is still a chance the deal could fall through but, given that more than 99% of the creditors approved the deal, the odds of failure look slim - leaving Herbert Smith in the position of succeeding where several other insolvency advisers have failed in recent years. Only a month ago, Walker Morris and Berwin Leighton Paisner attempted a similar arrangement for shoe store Stylo but landlords objected to the proposed rent reduction, leaving the company to fall into pre-pack administration and subsequent buyout.
A previous CVA agreed by electrical retailer Powerhouse also failed, with the deal struck down, the store collapsing and the matter ending in a 2007 High Court battle with landlords that generated roles for Lovells and Charles Russell. Had JJB's creditors not been more open-minded, the store would have headed down the same path, with administration looking unavoidable. Instead, after some five months of negotiations on the part of Herbert Smith - which worked alongside JJB's regular adviser Halliwells - the company will continue to operate, saving thousands of jobs.
The deal is significant for several reasons: not only is it one of only a small number of CVAs in the retail sector, it could also be the start of a trend for similar agreements, as creditors increasingly look at more creative ways of preserving companies, rather than letting them fall into administration. As one partner involved in the process said: "It is a great structure and will provide a good blueprint for listed companies looking to restructure without having to go into administration. It shows retailers and landlords can have constructive discussions and come to a mutually beneficial way forward."
Despite the positives though, few predict the deal will lead to a surge in retailers or other companies actively pursuing CVAs - the fact that agreements needs to be consensual means that for larger companies, or those with a large number of creditors, it will be harder to negotiate. However, it is at least one more option on the table, which is good news both for UK business and restructuring lawyers, particularly as some suggest the structure can offer greater opportunity for lawyers to get involved in negotiations. That said, the latest insolvency figures, which show nearly 5,000 corporate collapses in England and Wales in January to March 2009, demonstrate that restructuring lawyers are far from short of work.
While there's plenty of work for insolvency advisers, JJB offers hope of happier outcome
In the same week that figures from the Insolvency Service revealed company administrations grew by more than 50% during the first three months of 2009 compared to the previous year, the rescue of troubled sports retailer JJB Sports offered a glimmer of hope for companies in difficulty.
The rescue saw
Admittedly, there is still a chance the deal could fall through but, given that more than 99% of the creditors approved the deal, the odds of failure look slim - leaving
A previous CVA agreed by electrical retailer Powerhouse also failed, with the deal struck down, the store collapsing and the matter ending in a 2007 High Court battle with landlords that generated roles for Lovells and Charles Russell. Had JJB's creditors not been more open-minded, the store would have headed down the same path, with administration looking unavoidable. Instead, after some five months of negotiations on the part of
The deal is significant for several reasons: not only is it one of only a small number of CVAs in the retail sector, it could also be the start of a trend for similar agreements, as creditors increasingly look at more creative ways of preserving companies, rather than letting them fall into administration. As one partner involved in the process said: "It is a great structure and will provide a good blueprint for listed companies looking to restructure without having to go into administration. It shows retailers and landlords can have constructive discussions and come to a mutually beneficial way forward."
Despite the positives though, few predict the deal will lead to a surge in retailers or other companies actively pursuing CVAs - the fact that agreements needs to be consensual means that for larger companies, or those with a large number of creditors, it will be harder to negotiate. However, it is at least one more option on the table, which is good news both for UK business and restructuring lawyers, particularly as some suggest the structure can offer greater opportunity for lawyers to get involved in negotiations. That said, the latest insolvency figures, which show nearly 5,000 corporate collapses in England and Wales in January to March 2009, demonstrate that restructuring lawyers are far from short of work.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTo Thrive in Central and Eastern Europe, Law Firms Need to 'Know the Rules of the Game'
7 minute readGOP's Washington Trifecta Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250