Herbert Smith sets precedent with success of retail rescue
In the same week that figures from the Insolvency Service revealed company administrations grew by more than 50% during the first three months of 2009 compared to the previous year, the rescue of troubled sports retailer JJB Sports offered a glimmer of hope for companies in difficulty.
May 06, 2009 at 10:34 PM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
While there's plenty of work for insolvency advisers, JJB offers hope of happier outcome
In the same week that figures from the Insolvency Service revealed company administrations grew by more than 50% during the first three months of 2009 compared to the previous year, the rescue of troubled sports retailer JJB Sports offered a glimmer of hope for companies in difficulty.
The rescue saw Herbert Smith take the lead role for the stricken retailer, which secured a company voluntary arrangement (CVA) with its landlords. The agreement will see landlords of around 140 closed stores give up combined annual rental income of around £15m in return for a share of a £10m pot of money. Meanwhile, landlords of those stores remaining in operation have agreed to accept monthly rental payments instead of the large quarterly bills that have forced many retailers into collapse.
Admittedly, there is still a chance the deal could fall through but, given that more than 99% of the creditors approved the deal, the odds of failure look slim - leaving Herbert Smith in the position of succeeding where several other insolvency advisers have failed in recent years. Only a month ago, Walker Morris and Berwin Leighton Paisner attempted a similar arrangement for shoe store Stylo but landlords objected to the proposed rent reduction, leaving the company to fall into pre-pack administration and subsequent buyout.
A previous CVA agreed by electrical retailer Powerhouse also failed, with the deal struck down, the store collapsing and the matter ending in a 2007 High Court battle with landlords that generated roles for Lovells and Charles Russell. Had JJB's creditors not been more open-minded, the store would have headed down the same path, with administration looking unavoidable. Instead, after some five months of negotiations on the part of Herbert Smith - which worked alongside JJB's regular adviser Halliwells - the company will continue to operate, saving thousands of jobs.
The deal is significant for several reasons: not only is it one of only a small number of CVAs in the retail sector, it could also be the start of a trend for similar agreements, as creditors increasingly look at more creative ways of preserving companies, rather than letting them fall into administration. As one partner involved in the process said: "It is a great structure and will provide a good blueprint for listed companies looking to restructure without having to go into administration. It shows retailers and landlords can have constructive discussions and come to a mutually beneficial way forward."
Despite the positives though, few predict the deal will lead to a surge in retailers or other companies actively pursuing CVAs - the fact that agreements needs to be consensual means that for larger companies, or those with a large number of creditors, it will be harder to negotiate. However, it is at least one more option on the table, which is good news both for UK business and restructuring lawyers, particularly as some suggest the structure can offer greater opportunity for lawyers to get involved in negotiations. That said, the latest insolvency figures, which show nearly 5,000 corporate collapses in England and Wales in January to March 2009, demonstrate that restructuring lawyers are far from short of work.
While there's plenty of work for insolvency advisers, JJB offers hope of happier outcome
In the same week that figures from the Insolvency Service revealed company administrations grew by more than 50% during the first three months of 2009 compared to the previous year, the rescue of troubled sports retailer JJB Sports offered a glimmer of hope for companies in difficulty.
The rescue saw
Admittedly, there is still a chance the deal could fall through but, given that more than 99% of the creditors approved the deal, the odds of failure look slim - leaving
A previous CVA agreed by electrical retailer Powerhouse also failed, with the deal struck down, the store collapsing and the matter ending in a 2007 High Court battle with landlords that generated roles for Lovells and Charles Russell. Had JJB's creditors not been more open-minded, the store would have headed down the same path, with administration looking unavoidable. Instead, after some five months of negotiations on the part of
The deal is significant for several reasons: not only is it one of only a small number of CVAs in the retail sector, it could also be the start of a trend for similar agreements, as creditors increasingly look at more creative ways of preserving companies, rather than letting them fall into administration. As one partner involved in the process said: "It is a great structure and will provide a good blueprint for listed companies looking to restructure without having to go into administration. It shows retailers and landlords can have constructive discussions and come to a mutually beneficial way forward."
Despite the positives though, few predict the deal will lead to a surge in retailers or other companies actively pursuing CVAs - the fact that agreements needs to be consensual means that for larger companies, or those with a large number of creditors, it will be harder to negotiate. However, it is at least one more option on the table, which is good news both for UK business and restructuring lawyers, particularly as some suggest the structure can offer greater opportunity for lawyers to get involved in negotiations. That said, the latest insolvency figures, which show nearly 5,000 corporate collapses in England and Wales in January to March 2009, demonstrate that restructuring lawyers are far from short of work.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Combative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump
4 minute readLaw Firms 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250