Lord Chancellor talks up developments in diversity and human rights
The Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, Jack Straw, took the opportunity last week to defend the Government's record of legislative reform. He argued that "the general view is that [Labour] should be much more self-confident" when promoting some of the landmark statutes passed in the last decade, such as the Human Rights Act 1998 and Freedom of Information Act 2000.
May 17, 2009 at 08:03 PM
4 minute read
The Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, Jack Straw, took the opportunity last week to defend the Government's record of legislative reform. He argued that "the general view is that [Labour] should be much more self-confident" when promoting some of the landmark statutes passed in the last decade, such as the Human Rights Act 1998 and Freedom of Information Act 2000.
Straw's remarks came during a reception for the Young Fabians – the junior section of the centre-left think-tank – hosted by Clifford Chance (CC) on Wednesday evening (13 May). Against the backdrop of a week of dire headlines for politicians across the board, Straw described the MP's expenses scandal as "some of the most difficult few days in the last thirty years, which have been very seriously damaging to public trust".
Nonetheless, the revelations over expenses had arisen indirectly as a result of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, a "measure which has made the state much more accountable than it was". Straw was one of the sponsors of the Bill when it was first brought before Parliament. Originally the White Paper had suggested that Parliament should be excluded from its provisions, but at the suggestion of two parliamentary committees, it had been expressly included.
Straw highlighted some of the key reforms implemented by the Government in recent years. In particular he said he was proud of the improvements in diversity in the legal profession. "One of the terrific things about the legal profession is that there are now greater numbers of women and ethnic minority candidates entering the profession than ever before." But there was still much work to be done, given that "the middle and senior judiciary are white, middle-class and male".
The concept of human rights has become an almost pejorative term in the British media, and Straw acknowledged that "no point denying people take the view that the Human Rights Act is an 'Aunt Sally', which is blamed for all sorts of things, often unfairly". As a result, the Government has brought forward proposals to introduce a Bill of Rights and Responsibilities in order to "rebalance the case" for the Human Rights Act. However, the Ministry of Justice White Paper, 'Rights and responsibilities: developing our constitutional framework', published in March 2009, states that "the Government is clear that fundamental rights cannot be legally contingent on the exercise of responsibilities".
When questioned as to the apparent contradiction of introducing rights without concomitant responsibilities, Straw noted that it was necessary to "differentiate between rights which are absolute and those which are to be balanced", but that rights and responsibilities are "two aspects to how we live our lives, even if they are not absolutely symmetrical".
Straw was also asked whether he felt the Government had decreased accountability as a result of the introduction of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), in which detainees are not told the charges made against them, nor given the opportunity to challenge them directly. He conceded that "there are conflicts here - it is not a perfect system of justice", but that "on SIAC we have got the balance about right".
However, Straw did accept that there was an argument that some legislative measures had gone too far. In particular, questions arose over the far-reaching implications of Section 76 of the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 which, read together with Section 58 of the Terrorism Act 2000, makes it an offence to take photographs of the police or armed forces. Straw raised the possibility of reviewing the law in the future. "If we are able to calm the terrorist threat, then I think there is a case for going through the counter-terrorism legislation and asking whether or not it is necessary."
In the wake of the G20 protests, where evidence from photographers and journalists has been crucial to determining the events leading up to the death of Ian Tomlinson, this is to be welcomed. CC public policy head Michael Smyth reacted positively to Straw's pledge, saying: "The Lord Chancellor's determination to look again at some of the extended anti-terror provisions is extremely encouraging".
Thom Dyke will start pupillage at Hardwicke Building in October 2009.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250