US pioneer runs panel review through online networking site
Houston-based manufacturer FMC Technologies is looking to update its roster of outside counsel and hire firms that embrace innovation, technology and, especially, alternative billing arrangements. But its general counsel, Jeffrey Carr, isn't holding an auction or putting out a request for proposals to find them. Legal OnRamp.jpgHe's using Legal OnRamp, a social networking site for lawyers that works much like Facebook and LinkedIn. Carr calls it the FMC Technologies 1st Law Litigation Value Challenge. "We love change. We love challenges," Carr says. "We like doing things differently. Some people call us grenade throwers. Some people call us crazy. But it works."
May 17, 2009 at 08:03 PM
4 minute read
Houston-based manufacturer FMC Technologies is looking to update its roster of outside counsel and hire firms that embrace innovation, technology and, especially, alternative billing arrangements. But its general counsel, Jeffrey Carr, isn't holding an auction or putting out a request for proposals to find them.
He's using Legal OnRamp, a social networking site for lawyers that works much like Facebook and LinkedIn. Carr calls it the FMC Technologies 1st Law Litigation Value Challenge. "We love change. We love challenges," Carr says. "We like doing things differently. Some people call us grenade throwers. Some people call us crazy. But it works."
The process is in its first phase, which will end on 31 May. Carr is asking firms to complete a two-page questionnaire that they can download from the site. Candidates can also ask questions and share their thoughts on an online discussion board.
Some of those firms will advance to a second phase, when they'll talk numbers, such as explaining how much they think certain legal matters should cost. Then two to five firms will move to the third phase, which will be a basic dog-and-pony show, Carr says.
That's when he finds out if he'd like to go out and have a drink with the candidates after work. "They are part of our business team, and they need to be compatible," Carr says.
But any firm that's selected must embrace alternative billing arrangements. FMC uses a program it calls the Alliance Counsel Engagement System, or ACES. It's a risk/reward model in which the company withholds a portion of a law firm's fees. And at the end of a set time period, or the conclusion of the matter, FMC lawyers conduct a performance review. If the firm performed better than average, it receives the amount withheld, plus a bonus. If the company isn't satisfied, the firm doesn't get back the entire amount that was withheld. "We've been doing this for years, and it's been very, very effective," Carr says.
The company is most interested in hiring firms that are willing to work under that model. But Carr says he's willing to consider any alternative billing proposals a firm may have.
Patrick Lamb, a business trial lawyer with the Valorem Law Group in Chicago, has worked for FMC and says Carr is always open to new ideas that save money. "Jeff and his colleagues are data-driven and bottom-line driven," Lamb says. "If there is a way to do it cheaper, I guarantee Jeff will give it due consideration."
The lawyers who have posted comments on the discussion board say they like the fact that FMC is sharing its selection process online. Stephen Rosenberg, a lawyer with The McCormack Firm in Boston, wrote that he and others have always believed that if companies were more open about how they retain outside counsel, they would receive better, and less expensive, legal services.
"The question now," Rosenberg says, "is whether those of us who have always believed companies should do that are willing to walk the walk and compete."
Some lawyers might be afraid of performance-based fee arrangements because it introduces an element of risk, said John Matter, a lawyer in Kentucky who practices commercial litigation. But that risk can be offset by the chance to reap financial rewards for doing good work. "My hat is off to all of you for trying a new approach," Matter says. "It is about time we had some entrepreneurship in our profession."
US-based legal consultant Rees Morrison, said that he wants FMC to analyse the various proposals it gets from law firms and publish a report. Lawyers everywhere will want to see the bigger picture. "You may well be generating the best, most representative view of what law firms in the US currently feel are innovative offerings," Morrison says.
Carr is reluctant to predict how successful the value challenge will be. The worst that can happen is that he ends up hiring the same firms he's used in the past, he says. "It's going to depend on what we see," Carr says. "And what we're hoping is that this will serve as a catalyst for law firms to think differently about the way they do things."
Posted on 18 May by Amy Miller. This article first appeared on The Am Law Daily blog on americanlawyer.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250