Path to partnership
Want to be a partner but unsure how to get there? You are not alone. My experience suggests that there are two problems here - and both have been created by lawyers themselves. First, law students and junior lawyers are selected for their academic abilities only, with the focus of their education and training on legal theory and legal skills. Business development or management aspects of legal practice are not explained and no training is provided. As a result, it sometimes comes as a surprise to many juniors that a law firm operates as a business. But that's the reality, and the first hurdle for any firm is to find a client to advise. Only then can they deliver the advice.
May 19, 2009 at 08:03 PM
2 minute read
Want to be a partner but unsure how to get there? You are not alone. My experience suggests that there are two problems here – and both have been created by lawyers themselves.
First, law students and junior lawyers are selected for their academic abilities only, with the focus of their education and training on legal theory and legal skills. Business development or management aspects of legal practice are not explained and no training is provided. As a result, it sometimes comes as a surprise to many juniors that a law firm operates as a business. But that's the reality, and the first hurdle for any firm is to find a client to advise. Only then can they deliver the advice.
It's indisputable that technical skills are very important, but behaving as if they are the be-all and end-all means many juniors are entirely unprepared for the challenges they will face later in their legal careers. What happens is that lawyers who reach the stage of technical competence in their careers (which on average occurs at about the 5 PQE mark) discover that they must reinvent themselves as salespeople in order to be seen as contenders for partnership. Until this point, nobody had explained to me that an ability to bring clients to the firm was the skill that would ultimately determine whether or not I'd make partner. As a result, most senior associates' business development skills are underdeveloped.
The second problem is that the information on partnership opportunities – and criteria for selection – are often a secret carefully guarded by law firms. Therefore, those with partnership ambitions not only face the difficulty of having to hone dormant business development skills, but they also have to contend with a system that fails to disclose what they need to do to make partner. I hear that in some firms, associates are told that they are not ready yet to start a discussion about partnership prospects – and it remains unsaid when the right time will come.
The topic of partnership is a delicate one in the legal profession, but the current information void surely make things harder for everyone.
Kate Karakuli (name changed) is a senior associate at a top UK firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250