A client's guide to getting it right
There's a lot of pontificating about how lawyers should get those all-important client relationships right (or at least a little less wrong than they often manage). Personally, I suspect the main ingredients are mutual respect, good communication and an understanding that a relationship is a two-way thing. But the purpose of this blog is not for me to come up with an answer. Instead, I'd like to flag up the answer of someone more qualified at a recent industry debate I attended on the future of the profession. These things are usually pretty turgid, but I thought it turned out pretty well in this case. And the standout comment came when a senior lawyer with a major UK bank was asked how external advisers get the relationship right. I thought his response was one of the best answers to that familiar question I've heard. So here it is:
May 26, 2009 at 08:03 PM
3 minute read
There's a lot of pontificating about how lawyers should get those all-important client relationships right (or at least a little less wrong than they often manage). Personally, I suspect the main ingredients are mutual respect, good communication and an understanding that a relationship is a two-way thing. But the purpose of this blog is not for me to come up with an answer. Instead, I'd like to flag up the answer of someone more qualified at a recent industry debate I attended on the future of the profession. These things are usually pretty turgid, but I thought it turned out pretty well in this case. And the standout comment came when a senior lawyer with a major UK bank was asked how external advisers get the relationship right. I thought his response was one of the best answers to that familiar question I've heard. So here it is:
"It's incredibly difficult to define. The analogy I would draw is in The Guardian on Saturday – there is an interview with an individual and the same question is always asked: What does love look like? And there are obviously a huge range of answers. I'm not saying that this is love, but it's the same sort of relationship – it is very difficult to calibrate. You know the relationship is right when it happens. I can go through our panel and I can probably pick my top three people that I know, (individuals within the firm rather than firms themselves), who will be advising us, will be advising me in the years to come, because they get it right. To put it at its bluntest, it is about making me look good – never, ever causing any issues in terms of billing, offering to provide a secondee when they know I really need one rather than with me hawking around and getting on bended knee. It's those sort of things and just having an insight into where the department and wider group is."
If you want to read more, click here. Meanwhile, while we're on the subject of clients, Legal Week last month tried to do its bit to help in-house lawyers network with the launch of a dedicated group for employed lawyers on LinkedIn. Since then the group has attracted more than 500 members (out of 1,100 who requested membership). Obviously it's early days for us, but it's a venture we hope to build on considerably over the coming weeks. Any feedback on how the network should develop will be greatly received – contact me by emailing [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1People in the News—Dec. 23, 2024—Barley Snyder, Marshall Dennehey
- 2How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be a Lawyer First, Foremost and Always,' Says Matthew McLaughlin of Venable
- 3Bar Report - Dec. 23
- 4Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 5The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250