The end of sisterhood
The sisterhood of lawyers has never been more potent. In conference rooms and swanky restaurants, women across the ranks - senior partners and associates, general counsel and staff attorneys - are brainstorming about what it takes for women to succeed in a profession that is still predominantly male. Over sushi, cosmos, and the occasional mani/pedi treatment, they are bonding, united in the mission for gender equality. The message is clear: women are united, and they want their sisters to succeed.
May 27, 2009 at 09:33 PM
5 minute read
The claws are out, it seems, as the feminist ideals of career women 'in it together' appears to be over. Vivia Chen reports on the tensions experienced by female lawyers
The sisterhood of lawyers has never been more potent. In conference rooms and swanky restaurants, women across the ranks – senior partners and associates, general counsel and staff attorneys – are brainstorming about what it takes for women to succeed in a profession that is still predominantly male. Over sushi, cosmos, and the occasional mani/pedi treatment, they are bonding, united in the mission for gender equality. The message is clear: women are united, and they want their sisters to succeed.
But scratch the surface a bit deeper, and some members of the sorority tell another story: that women – particularly their immediate superiors – can be their worst tormentors. The fact is, despite the veneer of harmony and the decades of shared struggle, there's tension on the women's front. Talk to any group of women lawyers, and there will be plenty of war stories of the betrayals – real or perceived – that they have experienced at the hands of other women.
These are more than just anecdotes. Last year, in an American Bar Association survey, a majority of female lawyers under 40 expressed a preference for male bosses (the 1,400 respondents gave men higher marks for constructive criticism and keeping confidences). Moreover, in a University of Toronto study of US workers released last autumn, women who reported to a female boss claimed greater depression, anxiety, headaches and other ailments than those who worked for a man.
What makes this different from the usual tensions between boss and subordinates? In a word: expectation. Women expect other women to be more empathetic and nicer – or at least hope they'll be. When their women bosses aren't, some women feel betrayed. And that betrayal can feel especially sharp and personal coming from someone who shares XX chromosomes.
"As post-feminists, we are told that women are nurturers and that we are all in it together," says California-based consultant Peggy Klaus, who conducts workshops for women in corporations and firms. "Women can accept hierarchy from men, they can tolerate their yelling and bad behaviour." But when women bosses cross the line, Klaus says, women take it very personally. Moreover, "when women have conflicts with other women, they take it home and nurse it," says Lauren Rikleen, author of Ending the Gauntlet.
Generational differences can aggravate the tension. Former Winston & Strawn partner Jane Pigott, now a law firm consultant, says that the older generation of women lawyers ('queen bees' to the younger set) often made huge personal sacrifices to achieve professional success, and that some expect the next generation to pay the same dues. "After I had my daughter, I didn't want to stay at the office every night for dinner," says an associate at a New York firm. "I don't expect men to understand that," she says, but adds that she was disappointed when she got a similar reaction from a woman partner.
But that sense of betrayed expectation also exists between women in the same generation – particularly where there are few women in top positions. "She will mentor a man before she will mentor me," says one 40-something lawyer at a Fortune 500 company about her female boss. "She wants to be the only woman lawyer representing our group." The irony, she adds, is that her boss is active with the company's women's initiative. Though this lawyer says she gets support from women peers and women on the business side, the sad truth is that "in the direct chain of command, there is still competition [between women]".
All this has the potential for a retro, politically uncomfortable drama. Indeed, the focus on tensions among women strikes some as sexist. "It's a very dismissive notion," says Rikleen. "There's no counterpart to the term 'catfight' when men compete against each other for client credit."
But Rikleen, like others who study women in the legal profession, won't deny that there's something distinctly pointed about the acrimony between women bosses and employees. What's needed, Rikleen says, is "to train women to depersonalise conflict".
A good starting point would be to lower expectations. In fact, those cosy after-work gatherings might be promoting a false sense of intimacy that belies the inevitable tensions of a work relationship. What's more, women need to get over the notion that women will play nice, says consultant Wendy Tice Wallner, who says she learned that lesson when she took up golf for client development: "The competition was palpable in a way I didn't find in playing against men." The lesson, she says, is that women must learn to compete and support each other at the same time. "Necessity will bring them together," predicts Wallner, adding that women need each other to catch up with men on business development. After a pause, she says: "But that doesn't mean they like each other."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan AI Beat the Billable Hour? Legal Tech Firms Say Selling AI Products to Law Firms Still a Challenge
More Young Lawyers Are Entering Big Law With Mental Health Issues. Are Firms Ready to Accommodate Them?
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250