Fighting for survival
Are you fighting for survival at your firm? The recession has brought about a lot of changes to the legal sector - and led to a myriad of internal battles in many law firms. The big picture is that firms have been forced to reconsider their structures, pricing and business development strategies in order to get through the difficult times. The smaller picture is internal conflicts fuelled by insufficient volumes of work (which do not allow everyone to achieve even the most modest targets), variable quality of work and, more generally, a deep-set insecurity about the future. Office battles, unlike street fights, are of a covert nature. But they are no less bloody. They have affected lawyers of various levels of experience - from trainees to senior associates and partners. In some instances they have gone way beyond what can be described as 'healthy competition'.
June 02, 2009 at 08:03 PM
3 minute read
Are you fighting for survival at your firm?
The recession has brought about a lot of changes to the legal sector – and led to a myriad of internal battles in many law firms. The big picture is that firms have been forced to reconsider their structures, pricing and business development strategies in order to get through the difficult times. The smaller picture is internal conflicts fuelled by insufficient volumes of work (which do not allow everyone to achieve even the most modest targets), variable quality of work and, more generally, a deep-set insecurity about the future. Office battles, unlike street fights, are of a covert nature. But they are no less bloody. They have affected lawyers of various levels of experience - from trainees to senior associates and partners. In some instances they have gone way beyond what can be described as 'healthy competition'.
See if you can relate to a couple of examples. Firstly, there is great concern about the number of jobs available this year at NQ level. There is fierce competition for the few positions available - and a lingering perception among some trainees that not everyone competes fairly. This breeds stress, anxiety and low morale.
Secondly, when there is little work available, the key question for qualified lawyers is that of work distribution policy. In addition to ensuring that tasks are carried out in the most efficient and cost-effective way, senior lawyers also face the challenge of keeping everyone in the department equally busy when delegating work. This inevitably leads to accusations of favouritism and criticism of management skills (in some cases justifiable, in some cases not).
Thirdly, when work-flows decrease, much greater emphasis is placed on business development. And the issue of 'client ownership' inevitably arises when lawyers from one team find themselves competing with another for the same clients. As I've found out, the principles of collaboration go straight out of the window when one's future is under threat.
When it comes to dealing with these issues, my advice is to make sure you are doing the best you can to optimise your chances. Be proactive in speaking to your managers about the volume and quality of your work; take an active interest in your colleagues' work; catch up with know-how training; consider how to maintain contacts with your existing clients and how you can add value to their businesses; and keep a record of your activities so that you can have a constructive discussion at your next appraisal.
Life may be stressful right now, but this is an excellent opportunity for lawyers to test their survival skills.
Kate Karakuli (name changed) is a senior associate at a top UK firm. For more of Kate's experiences, see Path to Partnership.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1People in the News—Dec. 23, 2024—Barley Snyder, Marshall Dennehey
- 2How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be a Lawyer First, Foremost and Always,' Says Matthew McLaughlin of Venable
- 3Bar Report - Dec. 23
- 4Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 5The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250