Dentons profits down 36% as restructuring costs hit home
Denton Wilde Sapte has unveiled a 36% fall in partner profits after a £3.5m restructuring charge contributed to a squeeze on profits. Dentons today (4 June) unveiled its financial results for the 2008-09 year, confirming that its underlying profits per equity partner (PEP) fell annually by 27% from £470,000 to £340,000.
June 04, 2009 at 11:45 AM
2 minute read
Denton Wilde Sapte has unveiled a 36% fall in partner profits after a £3.5m restructuring charge contributed to a squeeze on profits.
Dentons today (4 June) unveiled its financial results for the 2008-09 year, confirming that its underlying profits per equity partner (PEP) fell annually by 27% from £470,000 to £340,000.
However, profits were further hit by restructuring costs related to the firm's redundancy programme, the full cost of which has been incorporated into its 2008-09 year, pushing PEP down to £300,000. Total profits before exceptional costs were £29.3m, down from £40.4m the previous year.
Despite the sharp fall in profits, Dentons managed to maintain modest revenue growth with fee income rising 3% from £164.4m to £169.8m.
The firm cited continued growth in its Middle Eastern network, including a 26% rise in revenues in Dubai. The firm's international network currently accounts for around 25% of its revenue. Dentons' fastest growing practice group was technology, media & telecoms, which was up nearly 12%.
Dentons chief executive Howard Morris told Legal Week that the firm had managed a strong first half to its financial year before "activity fell off a cliff in mid-October". Morris added that activity levels appeared to have stabilised more recently with the firm achieving a stronger performance in May 2009 than in the same month in 2008.
The result is the sharpest fall in PEP yet announced in 2009 by a major UK law firm but comes amid expectations that most major City firms will see falling profits thanks to the current recession.
Dentons has taken a number of measures to position itself for a prolonged downturn, confirming this week that it had asked equity partners to contribute an average of £90,000 of capital into the business.
The firm's redundancy consultation concluded in March with the loss of 76 jobs, including 37 fee earners.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCanada’s Antitrust Watchdog Sues Google For Billions Over Ad Practices
3 minute readMorais Leitão Expands in Asia with Timor-Leste Partnership
Funder Behind Mastercard Case Says Settlement 'Struck Without Our Agreement'
Trending Stories
- 1Fulton Judge Weighs Whether to Order Fani Willis to Comply With Lawmakers' Subpoenas Over Trump Case
- 2Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
- 3Judge Rises to Tifton Superior Court Bench
- 4'It's Like They Lynched You:' Law Professor's Discrimination Claim Reaches High Court
- 5New Teeth for Anti-SLAPP Statute? Absolute Immunity for Union Grievance Proceedings
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250