Rio Tinto U-turn casts shadow over China M&A prospects
Among international law firms in China, 'outbound' work - representing Chinese companies looking abroad for investments and acquisitions as opposed to multinationals entering the Chinese market - has long been hailed as the next big thing. But the rejection this week of the largest such outbound China deal yet highlights continuing challenges to growth in the practice.
June 07, 2009 at 08:03 PM
4 minute read
Among international law firms in China, 'outbound' work – representing Chinese companies looking abroad for investments and acquisitions as opposed to multinationals entering the Chinese market – has long been hailed as the next big thing. But the rejection this week of the largest such outbound China deal yet highlights continuing challenges to growth in the practice.
Anglo-Australian mining giant Rio Tinto on Thursday (4 June) pulled out of a deal with the state-owned Aluminum Corporation of China (Chinalco), which had offered to pay $19.5bn (£12.2bn) for an 18% interest in Rio and stakes in copper, aluminum and iron mines. Other major Rio shareholders had criticised the transaction as a sweetheart deal for Chinalco, while it also become a lightning rod for political opposition concerned about allowing the Chinese Government such a major role in Australia's mining sector.
Christopher Stephens, Asia managing partner for Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, says the collapse of the deal, which was announced in February, is "kind of a shock".
"The Chinese have been very careful in the wake of the Unocal debacle," he says, referring to the failed bid by the China National Offshore Oil Company (CNOOC) to buy US oil company Unocal for $18.5bn (£11.5bn) in 2005, which also faced significant political opposition. "It really looked like they got this done."
Stephens thinks the deal's failure, particularly its political overtones, could dampen Chinese companies' enthusiasm for overseas investments and acquisitions, at least in the short term. "There is a risk it will slow down some of the bigger outbound M&A activity that is going on," he says.
International law firms with China offices have long hoped for the opposite. Whereas they face state-imposed practice restrictions as well as rising competition from cheaper local firms when handling inbound China work, outbound work allows them to work within their comfort zones – US or UK law – and also charge accordingly. Many international firms with smaller China offices are primarily hoping to funnel outbound work to their home markets.
Chinalco was represented by a group of firms led by Clifford Chance, while Linklaters led Rio's legal team.
Robert Chu, the head of Sullivan & Cromwell's Beijing office, says Chinese companies will probably be more cautious following the Rio deal. "The question Chinese parties might raise in connection with any kind of deal is whether they are is being taken for a ride or being used as a stalking horse."
Indeed, a number of Chinese companies' attempts at outbound acquisitions have seen other bidders conveniently swoop in. At the same time it announced it was scrapping its deal with Chinalco, Rio Tinto entered into a joint venture with competitor BHP Billiton. Likewise, Unocal was swiftly purchased by Chevron after CNOOC walked away from that deal. US appliance maker Whirlpool scooped up rival Maytag after China's Haier bowed out of a 2005 bid.
But Chu also thinks any one deal's failure is unlikely to deter Chinese interest in overseas acquisitions. "The fact that Chinalco's proposed investment in Rio is not being pursued further should not be cast as a bad omen for outbound transactions from China," argues Chu. "Indeed, it is a development that contributes to the maturation of Chinese enterprises as sophisticated players to be reckoned with on the global M&A scene."
Antony Dapiran (pictured), a partner in the Shanghai arm of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, is also optimistic that outbound Chinese transactions will grow, though probably outside politically charged sectors like energy and natural resources. "Those have always been particularly sensitive areas," he says.
Indeed, the economic downturn in the US and Europe means Chinese investments or acquisitions abroad should generally be far more welcome than in the past, says Stephens, noting the US Government's blessing this week of a preliminary plan for a Chinese company to buy General Motors' Hummer line of sport-utility vehicles.
"People want capital, they have capital," says Stephens.
By Anthony Lin in Hong Kong.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Ben Brafman Defending Celebrity Rabbi in Lawsuit by Miami Hotel
- 2People in the News—Dec. 23, 2024—Barley Snyder, Marshall Dennehey
- 3How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be a Lawyer First, Foremost and Always,' Says Matthew McLaughlin of Venable
- 4Bar Report - Dec. 23
- 5Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250