CC reshapes US litigation as two more partners leave
Clifford Chance (CC) is set to see another two litigation partners leave in New York, Legal Week has learnt. Securities litigators Joel Cohen and George Schieren are both preparing to exit the firm's US arm, with the departures leaving the firm with four litigators in New York.
June 09, 2009 at 07:03 AM
2 minute read
Clifford Chance (CC) is set to see another two litigation partners leave in New York, Legal Week has learnt.
Securities litigators Joel Cohen and George Schieren have both decided to exit the firm's US arm, with the departures leaving the firm with four litigators in New York.
The news, which has been announced internally within CC, follows a stream of exits from CC's New York litigation practice. Global litigation and dispute resolution chief Mark Kirsch announced he was planning to leave little more than a week ago, with securities litigation head Mark Holland also quitting to join Goodwin Procter. It is unclear where Cohen, Schieren and Kirsch are heading.
All four departures come as the firm prepares to reshape its litigation strategy in the US. The firm will shift its focus towards regulatory, investigations, antitrust, commercial disputes and international arbitration – moving away from the securities litigation work the firm inherited through its merger with Rogers & Wells in 1999.
The practice overhaul is expected to result in a number of associate redundancies, with the firm currently reviewing 29 positions.
However, CC maintains that it is still dedicated to its litigation practice in New York and Washington.
One litigation partner commented: "We are refocusing the litigation practice in New York and it is an ongoing process of making sure we get it right. We are establishing our priorities going forward and shaping our business to the size we need it to be."
A replacement for Kirsch in his global role has yet to be decided, with the firm expecting to hold elections at the end of the summer. Washington DC disputes partner Juan Morillo has replaced him as head of the US litigation and dispute resolution practice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Jones Day Expands European Footprint with Global Disputes Partner in Madrid
Trending Stories
- 1Supreme Court of Georgia Disbars 1, Reinstates 1
- 2New York City’s Failure to Pay Its Bills Is Putting Vulnerable New Yorkers in the Crosshairs
- 3Immigration Under the Trump Administration: Five Things to Expect in the First 90 Days
- 4Justice on the Move: The Impact of 'Bristol-Myers Squibb' on FLSA Forum-Shopping
- 5Wachtell Helps Miami Dolphins Secure One of NFL’s First Private Equity Deals
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250