Reed Smith chief Jordan sees off leadership challenge
Reed Smith's veteran chief, Greg Jordan, has defeated a leadership challenge that threatened to end his nine-year run at the helm of the top 25 US law firm. Philadelphia-based employment partner John DiNome has decided he will no longer run against Jordan to serve as the firm's global managing partner and chairman of its executive team.
June 10, 2009 at 07:00 AM
4 minute read
Reed Smith's veteran chief, Greg Jordan, has defeated a leadership challenge that threatened to end his nine-year run at the helm of the top 25 US law firm.
Philadelphia-based employment partner John DiNome has decided he will no longer run against Jordan to serve as the firm's global managing partner and chairman of its executive team.
News emerged last week in the US media that DiNome had written a lengthy memo to firm partners announcing his candidacy for the September election and laying out a number of areas in which he argued the firm was headed in the wrong direction.
According to local press reports, DiNome called for a more independent executive committee and said a lack of checks and balances was leading to "exorbitant capital expenditures". He said the firm was overpaying its managers and called for a greater use of alternative fee arrangements as many smaller clients look to smaller firms and lower hourly rates.
Both Jordan and DiNome had said they agreed not to talk about the election publicly, but with the race now back to being uncontested, Jordan spoke to Legal Week's US sister title The Legal Intelligencer.
Jordan said he and DiNome met and realised there was some common ground between them. He said it was DiNome's decision to pull out of the race, and he will continue on at the firm as normal.
Jordan said: "All businesses have a lot to focus on right now so to the extent we can have maximum focus on working our way through the global slowdown, the better off the firm will be."
Some in the legal community questioned whether DiNome, who joined Reed Smith in 1996, would have had a chance against Jordan, who has a long history with the firm and has led Reed Smith far up the Am Law 100 chart to become the 16th largest firm in the US in terms of gross revenue.
Under Jordan, Reed Smith has also substantially raised its global profile after in 2006 securing a takeover of London's Richards Butler, making the firm one of a handful of American practices to achieve a major UK merger. The firm followed up the City move the following year by securing a deal to take on Richards Buter's highly-rated Hong Kong practice.
Since Jordan came on board in 2001, Reed Smith has seen its lawyer headcount grow from 600 to about 1,500 and its gross revenue rise from $268m (£1.67m) to $979.5m (£612m), while its profits per equity partner increased from $400,000 (£250,000) to $940,000 (£587,000).
However, the expansionary firm has been hard hit by the recession, laying off more than 230 lawyers and staff since late 2008, including 28 roles at its UK arm. It also this year became one of the first major US law firms to cut associate pay, dropping salaries by 10% across most of its US offices.
Reed Smith has a self-nomination process for running for managing partner, and Jordan said he had to decide whether he would run again for the term that begins in January 2010.
Jordan said it depends on the firm. He said Reed Smith did pretty well last year and continues to perform strongly in 2009.
Jordan said Reed Smith's strategy will remain largely unchanged in his next three years, assuming no others look to challenge him before September – a prospect sources have said is unlikely. And that strategy is to position the firm to broadly service its major client relationships around the world.
"We are using a variety of strategies to not just get through the downturn, but be positioned to be a long-term winner in this," Jordan said.
"We have got this geographic diversification that really helps us. We have got a practice balance that is very attractive right now."
Reed Smith has scaled back the corporate and real estate practices, and now two-thirds of the firm's lawyers globally are focusing on litigation and restructuring work, he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBird & Bird Steers Katjes in Bittersweet Dispute with Lindt & Nestlé Over Vegan Chocolate Patent
Hong Kong Bourse Seeks Feedback on IPO Price Discovery, Takes Steps to Boost Capital Markets Activity
Big Four Japanese Firm Mori Hamada Launches Foreign Joint Law Enterprise, Joins Rebrand Drive
US Wins Trade Dispute with Mexico Over Genetically Modified Corn
Trending Stories
- 1Ben Brafman Defending Celebrity Rabbi in Lawsuit by Miami Hotel
- 2People in the News—Dec. 23, 2024—Barley Snyder, Marshall Dennehey
- 3How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be a Lawyer First, Foremost and Always,' Says Matthew McLaughlin of Venable
- 4Bar Report - Dec. 23
- 5Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250