Wragges set to cut 85 more jobs after 17% revenue drop-off
Wragge & Co has unveiled its 2008-09 financial results and announced a second redundancy round set to affect up to 85 people. The national firm has reported a 17% drop in turnover for the last financial year, with revenues falling from £125m in 2007-08 to £104.3m. The firm is yet to finalise its average profits per equity partner. Wragges has also launched a redundancy consultation, as well as announcing a range of cost-saving measures. Up to 85 people could lose their jobs as a result of the 30-day consultation, including fee earners, support staff and secretaries. Those that remain with the firm will see their salaries frozen.
June 10, 2009 at 09:28 AM
3 minute read
Wragge & Co has unveiled its 2008-09 financial results and announced a second redundancy round set to affect up to 85 people.
The national firm has reported a 17% drop in turnover for the last financial year, with revenues falling from £125.6m in 2007-08 to £104.3m. The firm is yet to finalise its average profits per equity partner, but early indications suggest a dip of around 30% from last year's figure of £483,000.
The firm cited employment, pensions and projects as good performers but said that real estate was down and that litigation had not taken off as expected.
Wragges has also launched a redundancy consultation that could see up to 85 people lose their jobs, with the cuts expected to be evenly split between fee earners, support staff and secretaries. All practices in the firm's Birmingham and London offices are likely to be affected by the 30-day consultation.
However, Wragges hopes most of those involved in the consultation will stay with the firm, with positions saved through other cost-saving measures under consideration such as four-day weeks, sabbaticals, unpaid leave, job-sharing, career breaks and extended maternity and paternity leave.
Staff remaining with Wragges will see their salaries frozen while newly-qualified rates are dropping from £63,000 to £57,000 in London and from £41,000 to £36,500 in Birmingham.
Wragges senior partner Quentin Poole said that with less money coming into the business, the firm would have to find ways to reduce costs but redundancies, although a possibility, would be a last resort.
He told Legal Week: "This is a redundancy consultation, but we regard redundancies as a last resort and we are working with all of our people from now to find innovative and creative ways to find other solutions such as sabbaticals and four-day weeks. This will not be something imposed through a top-down approach but will be based on the ideas of each practice group and what works for them."
The firm has also announced its partner promotions for 2009, promoting regulatory litigation lawyer Andrew Litchfield and corporate recovery specialist Vicki Conway to its 112-strong all-equity partnership as of 1 May.
Meanwhile, Andrew Harrison, Andrew Lawton Smith and Ian Yule have all retired from the partnership, with Lawton Smith set to remain at the firm as a consultant.
In September last year Wragges made 24 fee earners redundant following its first consultation. Thirty roles were placed under review, with 12 staff ultimately taking voluntary redundancy.
A managing partner at a rival firm commented: "These results are not surprising. Wragges generates a significant amount of turnover out of London and had a big exposure in commercial property."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBird & Bird Steers Katjes in Bittersweet Dispute with Lindt & Nestlé Over Vegan Chocolate Patent
Hong Kong Bourse Seeks Feedback on IPO Price Discovery, Takes Steps to Boost Capital Markets Activity
Big Four Japanese Firm Mori Hamada Launches Foreign Joint Law Enterprise, Joins Rebrand Drive
US Wins Trade Dispute with Mexico Over Genetically Modified Corn
Trending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250