Eversheds moves its cash in fear of future bank collapses
Eversheds has moved at least £18m of firm and client money into different banks to offer protection in the event of further financial institutions failing. The law firm has transferred the bulk of the funds since October 2008, cutting back the number of institutions it uses from around 20, including Investec, to six UK clearing banks - including Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds and Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS).
June 11, 2009 at 01:03 AM
3 minute read
UK firm angers some banks with its cash-protection measures
Eversheds has moved at least £18m of firm and client money into different banks to offer protection in the event of further financial institutions failing.
The law firm has transferred the bulk of the funds since October 2008, cutting back the number of institutions it uses from around 20, including Investec, to six UK clearing banks – including Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds and Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS).
The move has strained relationships with some of the banks, with some understood to be sending Eversheds less work as a result of their frustration at seeing millions of pounds of deposits withdrawn.
Eversheds chief executive Bryan Hughes said: "As a business we made a decision following the banking issues of last year to move the firm's and client funds into the main UK clearing banks where funds are guaranteed by the UK Government. Our priority had to be to protect our client's money. It was a no-brainer for us."
He added: "We all hope the position becomes more stable and then we will have cause to consider our position again."
Other firms are also thought to have made similar decisions as a result of the financial crisis that has claimed names such as Norhern Rock and seen others, such as RBS, being bailed out by the Government.
The lack of confidence in the banking system has also seen firms moving their deposits across a wider range of institutions, with one City firm confirming that it now spreads its money across three banks rather than holding it with a single institution.
BDO Stoy Hayward head of professional services tax Colin Ives said: "Most firms have been looking at where they deposit their own and client funds. A lot of firms have moved their client money around from banks that would be deemed a higher risk. In addition firms have been spreading the money out so it is not all kept in one place."
Last October the Law Society issued guidance for law firms concerned about client accounts, warning firms to mitigate against a bank's collapse by moving client money to more secure banks and use multiple accounts to further reduce risk.
That same month Addleshaw Goddard paid equity partners their last two drawings from the 2007-08 financial year early because of concerns that it may not be safe leaving the money in the bank.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBird & Bird Steers Katjes in Bittersweet Dispute with Lindt & Nestlé Over Vegan Chocolate Patent
Hong Kong Bourse Seeks Feedback on IPO Price Discovery, Takes Steps to Boost Capital Markets Activity
Big Four Japanese Firm Mori Hamada Launches Foreign Joint Law Enterprise, Joins Rebrand Drive
US Wins Trade Dispute with Mexico Over Genetically Modified Corn
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250