Is it because I'm not from round here?
I grew up in Russia, but I never really thought of it as a disadvantage until someone asked me the question: "Did you ever get the feeling that your inability to secure pupillage may be influenced by the fact that you're foreign?"
June 14, 2009 at 08:03 PM
4 minute read
I grew up in Russia, but I never really thought of it as a disadvantage until someone asked me the question:
"Did you ever get the feeling that your inability to secure pupillage may be influenced by the fact that you're foreign?"
With a good degree, a major Inns of Court scholarship and lots of legal work experience, I think I have the CV of a typical aspiring barrister. Despite completing the BVC last year, I still haven't secured a pupillage and haven't had many interviews either. I know it's easy to blame someone else for your own misfortune, but I do begin to wonder whether the path to the Bar is more challenging for those with a foreign background.
The statistics for minority applicants are not very cheerful. According to the Bar Council's website, in 2008 there were 5.2% self-employed barristers of Asian origin, 2.3% of 'Other White' background, and just 0.2% in the Black Caribbean and African categories.
I was the first Russian student in my high school and sixth form college. As far as I am aware, I was also the only Russian on my BVC course. After searching the internet for hours, I only managed to find two Russian barristers in the UK – one in Manchester and one in London.
Advantages and disadvantages of being a foreigner
If it wasn't harder for foreigners, there wouldn't be all these equal opportunities provisions. The Bar's Equality and Diversity Code (Annex E) suggests that chambers need to monitor the representation of women, ethnic minorities and disabled people at different stages of the pupillage selection process, and deal with under-representation using the positive action provisions of the Race Relations and Sex Discrimination Acts.
Foreigners often face a number of obstacles, one of them being a language barrier. If English is not your first language, no matter how fluent you are, studying in the UK is more challenging. So a 2:1 LLB requires more effort, which isn't reflected in the qualification.
A foreign accent is another cause of concern. I don't mind my accent now, which is not strong, but if I had a choice, I'd lose it tomorrow. I have lived in the UK for around eight years; I completed my secondary and higher education here. Often, though, I get the feeling that on seeing my unusual name and hearing my accent, people assume that I am a foreigner who arrived in this country yesterday.
Even though 'received pronunciation' is no longer needed to get ahead, I can't help but wonder whether chambers have a slight bias in that direction. Because speaking skills are so essential for barristers, I worry that people will think I won't be as effective in court and with clients as I have an accent. Perhaps I should take elocution lessons.
There are some positives about being foreign, of course. We have the advantage of being fluent in another language, as well as the broadmindedness you get from living in a different culture. A different way of thinking could offer new and creative solutions to old problems. And a determination to succeed - common among foreigners – is always a plus in a competitive career. Also, the people you meet during work experience and mini-pupillages are more likely to remember you.
The reality
The Bar is a very competitive profession, and we all chose it knowing that our chances of success are very slim. When I hear about the people with first class degrees struggling to secure pupillage, I realise my lack of success is not abnormal.
Oxbridge graduates aside, we are all in a pretty similar boat. If you are an exceptional candidate, you will get noticed. And those two Russians who made it to the Bar means there's still hope for me, I think…
For more from Ekaterina, see her Legal Village blogs on work experience, scholarship interviews, searching for pupillage, the Pupillage Portal and the Bar Vocational Course.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250