Redundancy - a scary prospect
According to some of the more optimistic reports, the first clouds of recession may be lifting. However, the immediate prognosis for lawyers still seems to be rather bleak - an impression added to by an article in The Times last week entitled 'UK legal industry faces loss of 10,000 lawyers'. Although a fall in the number of lawyers is likely to be met with cheers in some quarters, what does it mean for us as a profession?
June 16, 2009 at 08:03 PM
3 minute read
According to some of the more optimistic reports, the first clouds of recession may be lifting. However, the immediate prognosis for lawyers still seems to be rather bleak – an impression added to by an article in The Times last week entitled 'UK legal industry faces loss of 10,000 lawyers'. Although a fall in the number of lawyers is likely to be met with cheers in some quarters, what does it mean for us as a profession?
For one thing, it's likely to work as a deterrent for entry into the profession at trainee level, and we're also likely to lose a lot of young talented NQs. While some of these losses are, to an extent, sadly inevitable, if taken too far, might they result in firms cutting off their future oxygen supply? The abandonment of an entire generation of lawyers is likely to create a gap that the firms would take several years to fill.
For those of us with City legal careers well underway, redundancy is a scary prospect. Not only would it be incredibly tough to find another job, but redundancy would stall the development of our skills and undermine professional confidence. We senior associates are criticised for our high salary expectations and warned that they may make us unemployable. But these expectations are based on real considerations, such as the size of our mortgages, school fees and other living expenses which remain inflexible.
Many of us will have to forgo our dreams about partnership for a long while, if not for good – leaving some casting around for other options. There is always the possibility of setting up your own practice – but it falls into the "I have nothing to lose" category. I know some lawyers who have recently done this and I have great admiration for their bravery and skills, but realistically, very few will be in a position even to contemplate such a move - and even fewer will succeed.
It is certainly true that the legal industry, like many others, is in great need of change. It is also probably true that shrewder law firms will come out of the recession leaner, stronger and better managed. However, the profession must be open about the extent of the casualties brought about by these changes. It must also ensure that it does not end up paying twice for these changes in the long run. In the meantime, I rely on the wisdom of the old proverb: "If you are drowning, you can only rely on yourself to pull you out".
Kate Karakuli (name changed) is a senior associate at a top UK firm. For more from Kate, see Fighting for survival and Path to partnership.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250