Do law schools need to change?
Amid continued uncertainty over the long-term viability of the global law firm business model - and suggestions that law schools need to reconsider the way they deliver legal education in response to the market - the York branch of the College of Law held its 20th anniversary celebrations last week. Speakers included the College CEO Nigel Savage and Law Society Vice President Robert Heslett; both of whom reflected on the likely long-term impact of the recession on the future of legal education.
June 23, 2009 at 12:14 PM
3 minute read
Preparing students for the post-recession landscape was the theme of the day at a recent College of Law get-together
Amid continued uncertainty over the long-term viability of the global law firm business model – and suggestions that law schools need to reconsider the way they deliver legal education in response to the market – the York branch of the College of Law held its 20th anniversary celebrations last week. Speakers included the College CEO Nigel Savage and Law Society Vice President Robert Heslett; both of whom reflected on the likely long-term impact of the recession on the future of legal education.
In emphasising the need to prepare students for the new environment emerging in the wake of the economic crisis, Savage drew an analogy with 20/20 cricket: "Here is a sport that has had to adapt to respond to the demands of the market place and in doing so has delivered a new business model and reshaped the experience of attending a cricket match. The legal services market needs to do the same, with lawyers changing to fit the needs of their clients – not vice versa."
Savage also highlighted the importance of law schools and firms maintaining their commitment to diversity despite the reduced number of jobs available after the recent wave of training contract deferrals.
Meanwhile, Heslett focused on the forthcoming relaxation of regulations governing the way law firms operate – which will allow external investment and non-lawyers to enter partnership – and how law schools must tailor their approach to fit in with the changes.
"The contrast between 20 years ago and now is stark. And as the boundaries between law and business become increasingly blurred, legal education needs to develop to reflect this," he said.
But it was junior lawyer national executive board member Kevin Poulter who had some of the most forthright things to say on the future of legal education.
"At the moment there are lots of students enrolling at law school who are completely unaware of the reality they will face in the job market at the end of it," he commented, adding that even if students do land a training contract, the chances of securing a job upon qualification are far from certain. Indeed, Clifford Chance and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer recently announced that they are to retain only 70% of trainees from their September intakes.
Poulter continued: "I think law schools have an obligation to be more realistic with students – and at the very least should be tailoring their courses to provide more transferable skills which will give graduates greater flexibility in what is a very competitive job market."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250