Norton Rose targets Asia with ambitious Deacons merger
Norton Rose has taken a dramatic step to reposition itself in the wider Asian region after securing a merger with Australian firm Deacons. The top 10 City law firm's partnership voted on the move last night (22 June) and Deacons will become part of Norton Rose Group on 1 January, 2010.
June 23, 2009 at 04:20 AM
4 minute read
Norton Rose has taken a dramatic step to reposition itself in the wider Asian region after securing a merger with Australian firm Deacons.
The top 10 City law firm's partnership voted on the move last night (22 June) and Deacons will become part of Norton Rose Group on 1 January, 2010.
The deal includes 146 partners across offices in Sydney, Brisbane, Melbourne, Canberra and Perth and will boost Norton Rose's headcount in the Asia-Pacific region to 700 fee earners. The firm's Singapore and Jakarta offices will also acquire teams of lawyers from Deacons.
In order to enter the agreement, Deacons Australia has terminated its 17-year joint venture agreement with Deacons Hong Kong.
After the acquisition, Deacons will rebrand to the Norton Rose Group and will continue to be led by current chief executive Peter Martyr and Deacons chief executive Don Boyd, who will become deputy group chief executive.
Newly-elected chairman Stephen Parish will continue in his role.
Deacons' Australian practice currently generates more than £100m of revenue, which will bring the combined group's turnover to £420m. The group will have around 1,800 lawyers globally.
Though the deal does not include Deacons' Asia network, the union has been touted as helping Norton Rose achieve its ambitions in the wider region, with the UK firm citing the Australian firm's substantial list of Asia clients, which include National Australia Bank and ANZ as well as several large Chinese enterprises.
Martyr commented: "We share the same global ambitions to develop our business and improve the depth and breadth of service to our clients. This move will enhance our international reach and in particular create one of the best resourced legal practices in the Asia-Pacific region.
"The economic influence in the world is moving eastwards and in order to develop our business we needed a significant expansion in our resources in the Asia-Pacific region. The increased capability of the group throughout the region will lay the foundations for further regional development and expansion."
Deacons' Boyd said: ""Everyone is very excited that this is the right thing for us to do. Norton Rose and Deacons Australia share the same business concerns and culture.
"We have shared aspirations regarding strategic growth, both in practice area terms and geographic expansion. The business case is compelling and the synergy of working together is convincing."
The deal makes Norton Rose the only City firm to secure a major merger with an Australian firm, though UK rivals such as Clifford Chance and Linklaters have previously explored such a union, with CC breaking off talks with leading Australian firm Mallesons Stephen Jaques at the end of last year.
Deacons is one of Australia's largest law firms in revenue terms, having built a well-regarded mid-tier practice in recent years.
The firms said that Deacons Australia will join Norton Rose Group, which comprises the UK Norton Rose LLP and its affiliated foreign practices, after its arrangements with its Hong Kong arm come to an end later this year.
The move has surprised many in the market, with some arguing that the benefits for Norton Rose are unclear.
A partner with one Australian firm told Legal Week: "From Deacons' point of view they gain exposure to a greater global network but I am struggling to see what it will give Norton Rose."
One partner with a top 10 City firm added: "My off-the-cuff reaction is that this is irrelevant. I don't see the synergies for a firm like Norton Rose to merge with a mid-tier Australian firm. I don't see what that really creates. Deacons doesn't have a large Asia practice so I don't really see the synergies there."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Simpson Thacher, Nishimura, Mori Hamada Assist on KKR's $4B Winning Bid in Japan
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250