A whole new kind of recession
Incisive Media's professional service division, of which Legal Week forms a part, recently gathered together senior figures from the recruitment industry to discuss the current malaise affecting the sector over a glass of wine or two.
June 29, 2009 at 08:03 PM
4 minute read
Incisive Media's professional service division, of which Legal Week forms a part, recently gathered together senior figures from the recruitment industry to discuss the current malaise affecting the sector over a glass of wine or two.
Although clients and recruitment consultants were represented, the audience was primarily made up of executives from advertising agencies, two of whom were panelists: Sue Sowerby, joint managing director at The Sowerby Group, and Stewart Goold, client services director at ThirtyThree.
The other panel members were: James O'Brien, director of private practice at LPA Legal, John Barnes, managing director, digital strategy at Incisive Media, and Tim Forster, former head of experienced recruitment at PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Sharing war stories appeared to have a cathartic effect on the panel and audience – and we had a wide-ranging discussion about the state of the market and where it might be heading. Here are some of the observations that were made:
How does this recession differ from the last one?
Considerably worse is the short answer. There are two reasons for this. First, because the credit crunch has hit every sector, whereas in the early 1990s there were some patches of growth. And second, because the web didn't exist back then, making life a lot more simple.
Everybody knew 2009 was going to be bad, but what problems were hard to foresee?
Budgeting has proved very difficult. It is human nature for people in business roles to keep busy in order to justify their existence. This applies to people in HR departments. Their companies may not be recruiting, but they need to keep active. Because of this, work that was promised at the start of the year has failed to materialise, driving a coach and horses through budgets. Agencies are also having to closely the monitor the resources they plough into pitches, given the number of prospects that come to nothing.
It is often said that recessions accelerate trends. Will print recruitment advertising ever return to anything like the levels seen before the downturn?
The web is a very powerful recruitment tool, but there will always be a place for print recruitment advertising – because of the branding opportunities if offers and because with online there is often a problem about the quality of applicants. There is a value in having people actively respond to print advertising as opposed to simply clicking a button to apply for a job.
The web presents HR departments with all sorts of low cost recruitment options – won't they simply cut out the middlemen and do the advertising themselves?
The web is exciting and fast-moving, but it is also extremely difficult to predict. If anything, this increases the need for companies to seek advice from consultants. If they try and do it themselves, they may be taking a big risk.
And what about the future for publishers like Incisive Media?
The web is a very fluid medium – fads come and go with remarkable speed and it is almost impossible to predict with any certainty where it is heading. In such an environment, established and trusted media brands are extremely well placed, especially if they are fleet of foot and learn how to ride off the back of platforms like Twitter.
Finally, as the economy stabilises, what are the prospects of the market picking up quickly?
Nobody doubts that the market will start to pick up, but one factor that could slow the pace of a return to some modicum of normality are the efforts many businesses are taking to hold on to their staff while cutting back on the cost of employing them, such as unpaid leave and part-time working. As business improves, these firms can gear themselves up accordingly without a wholesale return to the recruitment market.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250