Keys to the City
It has never been harder to get a training contract. There are more high calibre applicants than ever, while firms have fewer trainee places - and the situation is unlikely to change for the next few years. But hard does not mean impossible. There are still training contracts out there; you just have to stand out to get one.
June 29, 2009 at 07:28 AM
4 minute read
Allen & Overy trainee-to-be Adreanne Orunmuyi on getting your foot in the door at an international law firm
It has never been harder to get a training contract. There are more high calibre applicants than ever, while firms have fewer trainee places – and the situation is unlikely to change for the next few years. But hard does not mean impossible. There are still training contracts out there; you just have to stand out to get one.
I'm no expert, but I successfully went through the application process last year. I was delighted to secure a training contract with a magic circle firm, but I also remember clearly how demoralising the application process can be at times. I'm not a straight-A student, so I know a bit about standing out in the right way. Here are some of the techniques that worked for me:
Do your homework
First of all, call and check whether firms are still recruiting, as some have stopped without advertising it.
Having done that, think about the type of legal career that you want and target firms where you think you would fit in. Look for press coverage describing recent deals and their areas of expertise. Google firms and search for information about recruitment, training, expansion plans and their strategy for riding out the recession. All of this information will help you answer the 'Why us?' question.
Work experience
In this climate any legal experience will go a long way as it demonstrates that you're making an informed choice about your future career. If you apply for a vacation scheme and are instead offered an open-day, go to it. They usually provide useful tips about what firms are looking for and can be put down as legal experience on your application forms. They also give you a chance to make a good impression in person – and you never know what may come of them. I was offered a vacation scheme on the back of one open day, and a job as a paralegal on the back of another.
If you don't get a vacation placement, then be proactive, call smaller firms or the Citizens Advice Bureau and ask about opportunities with them. Think laterally: if you're interested in City law, then work experience in a corporate environment – not necessarily a corporate legal environment – would be beneficial. If your interests lie in niche areas like media law or human rights, then work experience at a magazine or civil liberties group would be helpful.
Also, don't underestimate the value of work experience in part-time or summer jobs. Being a shop assistant or a bar tender allows you to develop skills like teamwork, organisation, commitment and commercial awareness – all of which can be used on application forms and at interviews.
Play to your strengths
You need to be honest with yourself and identify your strengths and weaknesses. Try making lists of all your academic and extracurricular achievements, including things like work experience, society involvement, volunteer work and travel. Then pick out the best examples and put them in your applications, but make sure you explain which skills they helped you to develop and how.
If you don't have the best grades, focus on extracurricular activities. Use different examples for each answer as it shows you're well-rounded and makes for a more interesting read. Only mention the things that you would feel comfortable talking about in an interview – because if you write it down it will come up.
Finally, a few words of warning
You don't want to come across as boring, but avoid making 'wacky' statements – they're an easy way to stand out for the wrong reasons. If you're invited to an assessment centre, don't be the loudmouth who doesn't let anyone else speak.
If you get an interview, take a deep breath, relax and smile. Your application impressed someone so they just need to confirm that you're an intelligent, likeable person that they could put in front of a client. Applications are a tough test, but when you understand the formula you get results.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250