From the outside in
As an undergraduate at St Andrews University – which doesn't have a law faculty – it can be intimidating slogging it out for training contracts and pupillages with law students from English universities. But, as I've found out, you're not really at a disadvantage, provided that you go out and get some work experience.
July 03, 2009 at 07:07 AM
3 minute read
Non-law student Samantha Roberts on how work experience can make all the difference for those wondering if a legal career is for them.
As an undergraduate at St Andrews University – which doesn't have a law faculty – it can be intimidating slogging it out for training contracts and pupillages with law students from English universities. But, as I've found out, you're not really at a disadvantage, provided that you go out and get some work experience.
Marshalling
Being a barrister has always appealed to me, so the first work experience I arranged was a week marshalling for a judge in one of the Crown Courts in London. From my position at the judge's left hand side, I admit that I hardly got a realistic impression of the daily grind, but I did get to see a succession of brilliant performances by various barristers. Each time the judge retired from court, he would close the door behind me and ask, 'So, what do you think now?' Then he'd listen before, good-naturedly, pointing out a flaw in my reasoning.
The week of civil law marshalling I followed this up with was far less glamorous, but interesting nonetheless. I watched as marriages fell apart, people lost their homes and contracts were held and broken. Without any legal experience, it was the human aspect of cases that most struck me – even if I couldn't understand the law behind the facts, I could at least observe its presence in every aspect of social and private life.
Mini-pupillage
Next I did a mini-pupillage at a provincial set of barristers' chambers. By shadowing a barrister for a week, I learned practical things like the fact that lots of driving was required between regional courts, and that barristers do a lot of paperwork and research as well as fancy orations. Some barristers told me about a gendered 'glass-ceiling', while others claimed it never existed. Most said it was difficult to juggle family life and a career at the Bar. Most importantly, every barrister who said 'don't do it', added, 'but don't do anything else'. In other words, unstable and hard work it might be, but there's no substitute for doing what you love.
Law firm
I used my position as a member of St Andrews Law Society to visit law firms, primarily in London. I benefitted a lot from just wandering round the offices and chatting to trainees, associates and, on occasion, partners. There is absolutely no substitute for talking to people and seeing their work first-hand. Last-minute meetings abroad, for example, are only given real meaning when someone rushes out of a talk to grab their passport and go. The frequent late nights also only become apparent from talking to lawyers, and it becomes clear which training seats demand longer hours than others.
I'm still not sure which branch of the profession I want to go into, but now feel reasonably well-equipped to make an informed choice – and hopefully having a range of work experience on my CV will confirm to potential employers that I'm going into law with my eyes open.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 2Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 3Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 4Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
- 5Burr & Forman, Smith Gambrell & Russell Promote More to Partner This Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250