A barrister like Wills and other useless qualifications
The news that Prince William has been made an honorary barrister has provoked some annoyed responses - the flames of disgruntled public opinion fanned by William's decision to include a trademark Windsor gag in his acceptance speech.
July 09, 2009 at 04:53 AM
3 minute read
The news that Prince William has been made an honorary barrister has provoked some annoyed responses – the flames of disgruntled public opinion fanned by William's decision to include a trademark Windsor gag in his acceptance speech.
"I promise not to practise, except for the odd speeding ticket," quipped the heir to the throne as he addressed the Middle Temple earlier this week.
This little flourish was the final straw for Guardian 'Comment is free' writer Heather McRobie, who wrote in response: "To allow – even theoretically, even 'jokingly' – unqualified individuals like William to practise undermines everything the profession stands for. Would we make someone an honorary medical doctor? An honorary teacher?"
For Heather, I've got some reassuring news: William won't be allowed to practise – even to handle those speeding tickets. Being able to call yourself a 'barrister' and being able to practise as a barrister are, as I've found out the hard way, two very different things.
As a graduate of the Bar Vocational Course (BVC), I share with William the dubious honour of being able to call myself a 'barrister'. But as one of the many who tried and failed to get a pupillage, practising as a barrister would result in my likely incarceration – or at least a hefty fine. Our future king would, in theory, face the same sanction.
The point I'm trying to make is that the title of barrister was de-valued a long time before they gave it to Wills. For years now, BVC providers have welcomed law graduates with open arms and the promise that whatever happens, even if they don't get a pupillage (and only one in four do), they'll still get 'Called to the Bar' at the end of it and be able to call themselves barristers.
Well, a few words of wisdom for prospective BVC students: if you're planning on doing the course so you can stick 'barrister' after your name on your CV and wow people at dinner parties with your new title, you might want to think again. Like William, you won't be impressing anyone. I ended up getting into journalism, which in my hearts of hearts was what I think I really wanted to do, partly by writing about my experiences trying to get a pupillage, so the BVC wasn't a complete waste. But when I last checked, the BVC cost almost £15,000 and a NCTJ journalism course around £3,000.
To keep in touch with the latest student and junior lawyer news, join our Facebook group
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Calculated Push Into Law Firms
5 minute read'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250