A&O results: income up 7% as PEP dips to £1m
Allen & Overy (A&O) has managed a robust performance despite its heavy exposure to the battered banking sector with the firm achieving a 7% increase in revenue. The firm today (10 July) announced that fee income for 2008-09 hit £1.091bn, against £1.016bn the previous year. Profits per equity partner (PEP) fell 9% to £1m, according to the firm's own measure, against £1.122m the previous year.
July 10, 2009 at 12:03 AM
3 minute read
Allen & Overy (A&O) has managed a robust performance despite its heavy exposure to the battered banking sector with the firm achieving a 7% increase in revenue.
The firm today (10 July) announced that fee income for 2008-09 hit £1.091bn, against £1.016bn the previous year. Profits per equity partner (PEP) fell 9% to £1m, according to the firm's own measure, against £1.122m the previous year.
However, profitability was affected by an exceptional £46m cost for the firm's wide-scale restructuring, which saw A&O reduce partner, associate and support staff headcount by around 9%. The firm paid out £26.4m to departing partners, with the remaining £19.6m going on severance packages for lawyers and support staff.
The firm said that the average number of continuing full equity partners in 2009 was 335, against 362 in 2008. The total average partnership in 2009 is 490, up from 474 the previous year.
The drop in profits means the top of A&O's lockstep now stands at £1.345m down from £1.645m in 2007-08. Those at the bottom of the lockstep now receive £538,000 compared with £658,000 the previous year.
The firm's profit before exceptional charges and deductions for partners without full equity rights was £430.9m, against £447.2m the previous year. The £1m figure for PEP is based on total profits after all restructuring costs and payments to salaried partners have been deducted divided by the average number of full equity partners remaining with the firm after the restructuring.
If calculated on the basis of the 372 full equity partners the firm averaged over the 2008-09 year – a measure some firms prefer – PEP would fall to £974,000.
In common with most top City firms, A&O's revenue in sterling terms received a boost from the relative strength of the euro and the dollar. A&O billed more than half of its revenues abroad for the second year in a row, suggesting real term revenue was broadly static with 2008.
The results will be seen as a robust performance in the toughest commercial market facing law firms for a generation and puts A&O in a similar position to Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Linklaters, who last week announced their results.
In contrast Clifford Chance saw a 37% fall in PEP while revenue contracted by 5%.
Managing partner Wim Dejonghe told Legal Week that the firm identified litigation, restructuring, finance and infrastructure as the busiest areas during the financial year. As expected the firm's real estate and corporate practices suffered from the slump in commercial activity.
Dejonghe added: "These have been solid results. It has been a difficult environment, slightly flattered by the exchange rate, but this demonstrates the strength of our network. We had a very strong first half of the year.
"Our approach is to make the firm fit for the future. We want to be fair and upfront and have aimed to only do this [restructuring] once."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMoFo Launches in Amsterdam: Exclusive Interview with Global Chair Eric McCrath
2 minute readClifford Chance Boosts Private Credit Offering With Mayer Brown Partner Duo
2 minute readEx-Mayer Brown Corporate Lawyer Leads Race for German Chancellor in Snap Election
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1People in the News—Jan. 8, 2025—Stevens & Lee, Ogletree Deakins
- 2How I Made Partner: 'Avoid Getting Stuck in a Moment,' Says Federico Cuadra Del Carmen of Baker McKenzie
- 3Legal Departments Dinged for Acquiescing to Rate Hikes That 'Defy Gravity'
- 4Spalding Jurors Return $12M Verdict Against State Farm Insurance Client
- 5Special Series Part 3: The Statutory Guardrails Violate the Majority Vote Rule
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250