US firms in London - no retreat, no surrender (and a few new faces)
Unsurprisingly, given their size and diversity, international firms in London continue to defy easy categorisation. Having entered the UK market at different times, for different reasons, with different models, picking overall themes from Legal Week's annual survey of the largest foreign firms in London, is tricky.
July 12, 2009 at 08:03 PM
3 minute read
Unsurprisingly, given their size and diversity, international firms in London continue to defy easy categorisation. Having entered the UK market at different times, for different reasons, with different models, picking overall themes from Legal Week's annual survey of the largest foreign firms in London, is tricky.
True, the recession has generally silenced the (not always very convincing) talk of expansion that was still evident as late as last summer. Likewise, in a more risky environment, international firms as a breed are more cautious on City mergers – with only 21% of the 72 firms surveyed saying they are open to a UK tie-up, against 45% the previous year. That's ironic given that there has probably never been a better time to pick up a bargain in the London market.
There is also very little evidence looking at the overall figures that US firms in London are retrenching in the UK. For every firm whose headcount has shrunk a little on 2008, there are two that have made substantial increases. Many practices are holding pretty much level in staffing terms.
Some of the largest practices, like White & Case, Latham & Watkins and Mayer Brown, have grown headcount since 2008 even though all three firms have made some redundancies in the UK this year. It could be that a year from now there is some headcount reduction evident at some of those firms but shrinking practices are not yet on the radar (a notable exception being Shearman, which has seen headcount come back against 2008).
Past that you need to break firms into discreet sub-groups to learn much. In general the smaller US-law focused branches of profitable Wall Street firms have seen very little change and aren't expecting much in the future.
Some of the regional US law firms with lower profitability and woolly London strategies are pulling back but in many cases they are being replaced by newer entrants who have only turned their mind to the City in earnest in the last three years. This is underlined by the substantial levels of lateral hiring still ongoing at firms like Brown Rudnick, Gibson Dunn and Crowell & Moring.
What it hasn't been is a great 12 months for developing your own talent as international firms have not promoted many London-based partners over the last 12 months. That will be neither hear nor there if it proves to be a one-off in an exceptional market. But if it continues for several more years, many US firms will be undermining their own efforts to build successful long-term businesses.
There is also a pronounced conservatism at some very fine international firms with regard to expanding their UK practices, which is surely the only thing holding them back from being stronger forces in London and Europe. London firms will be thanking their lucky stars for that.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1People in the News—Jan. 8, 2025—Stevens & Lee, Ogletree Deakins
- 2How I Made Partner: 'Avoid Getting Stuck in a Moment,' Says Federico Cuadra Del Carmen of Baker McKenzie
- 3Legal Departments Dinged for Acquiescing to Rate Hikes That 'Defy Gravity'
- 4Spalding Jurors Return $12M Verdict Against State Farm Insurance Client
- 5Special Series Part 3: The Statutory Guardrails Violate the Majority Vote Rule
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250