Defy the downturn
At the close of the financial year, we reflect on what has been an exasperating period for many businesses. Economic instability has shaken the tables of many boards. Management teams have been faced with difficult decisions around direction and cost cutting, a lot of which has involved cutting the most important asset - people. We cannot say who has made the best move or the right decisions. The truth is, this recession has brought about problems never seen before
July 15, 2009 at 08:05 PM
8 minute read
As financial results are revealed, David Berragan investigates the trends of the past year and the characteristics that successful firms possess to go forward
At the close of the financial year, we reflect on what has been an exasperating period for many businesses. Economic instability has shaken the tables of many boards. Management teams have been faced with difficult decisions around direction and cost cutting, a lot of which has involved cutting the most important asset – people. We cannot say who has made the best move or the right decisions. The truth is, this recession has brought about problems never seen before.
Turnover in the legal sector declined 7.3% in the first quarter of 2009 compared with the first quarter of 2008. But while the drop in business levels has reduced work in certain areas, many legal firms have stepped up and grasped the opportunities that the economic position has presented.
Strong businesses with diversified practice areas have been able to maintain turnover even when demand is falling in certain areas. Litigation, insolvency, employment, restructuring and insurance have all benefited from the recession. Dispute resolution, infrastructure and technology, media and telecoms have also held up fairly well. Businesses with a strong focus in these areas and a quality service offering with high-calibre people have managed to grow.
It is important to remember that the industry's previous three years of double-digit growth was fuelled by robust global and UK economic growth, record global mergers and acquisitions, and high levels of activity in the financial and commercial markets, all of which have rapidly reversed. This has had significant negative impact on firms with large exposure to the property, corporate and financial services sectors, as well as businesses that rely heavily on M&A and high-volume transactions.
For the smaller firms, the drop in volumes affects them much more, as many have historically supplemented legal fees with the value of client balances which have fallen in both quantity and return in the low-interest environment.
Over the last 15 years, UK legal firms have expanded their reach into new waters across the globe. In the boom time, some saw this as a costly operation, with the overseas offices draining profits. However, now some may say those with a global reach are better equipped to defy the downturn. The global elite have benefited from the rise of Asia and other emerging markets. In fact, it is believed that the emerging markets make up 15% – 20% of revenues in some companies. We are seeing more and more firms announcing their focus on the rising dragon, in particular China, Hong Kong and Singapore.
Any firm with global activity and income from overseas will no doubt have had to sit up and consider the implications of the 30% moves we have seen over the last six to eight months in the sterling/dollar and sterling/euro rates. While some businesses may have suffered from the weaker pound, firms with work in the US and Europe billing in local currency have benefited profusely.
With the strong shifts in exchange rates, non-sterling income has boosted profits and revenues to counteract the fall in fee income. A word of caution, though: currency moves this extreme may not be repeated in the current year where we have already seen sterling strengthen against the dollar. We recommend speaking to the bank if you are concerned about currency exposure, as they may be able to offer strategies for protection.
From the financial results announced to date, we can see that the majority of businesses that have managed to maintain turnover have seen a dip in profits. This comes as no surprise, as profitability of the top 100 law firms has been slowing over the last three financial years and in this financial climate it was inevitable. The steady decline in profitability has taught the largest players to cut their cloth accordingly, and they have now become very accustomed to doing so. Even so, this year virtually all firms have had to make both fee earners and support staff redundant, freeze pay, introduce mandatory sabbaticals or reduce working weeks, all in an attempt to reduce their biggest cost.
There has not been a day gone by when people issues did not hit the headlines. This year, despite the copious cost cutting, profits have suffered severely, with some firms announcing 30% drops in profits per equity partner (PEP). The results at the close of this financial year include the cost of the redundancies made, and it will not be until next year that we have a clearer picture of the benefits.
Also affecting the bottom line this year is the collapse in interest rates. These historic lows come with two sides to the coin. While it has reduced borrowing costs, firms have seen returns disappear on balances held on behalf of clients, and those with commercial mortgages have found themselves locked in to relatively high interest rates. Consensus forecasts expect interest rates to remain at the current level throughout 2009 and only gradually increase next year, although some recent readings of the yield curve suggest that the market is now expecting rates to increase at a brisk pace in the latter part of 2010.
As ever, cash is king. Maintaining sufficient cash in the business has proven harder for law firms in the last year, as pressures on cash flow increase. Clients are taking longer to pay, as law firms are often seen as an easier creditor to delay, rather than other expenses such as utilities, rent or staff. While firms are improving their attempts to collect cash, lock up continues to worsen. The cash drain is exacerbated as firms are paying distributions and tax based on the previous year's performance, which in most cases was significantly better than the current year.
As a result, firms are having to make greater use of their borrowing facilities. The concern of having enough cash coupled with the general concern of the credit markets has prompted many firms to raise partner capital and request higher credit lines from their bank, even if it has been to the detriment of higher margins and fees. We are seeing a greater demand for businesses seeking to replace on-demand facilities with committed ones to provide greater comfort. This has been easier for firms that have their borrowing facilities correctly structured and for those who maintain an honest, open relationship with their bank.
Liquidity problems have been one of the biggest challenges for the survival of firms in the SME market. Interestingly for those businesses, a lack of cash causing late payments has been a greater problem than the lack of demand. This is an issue which could be avoided with the appropriate management information and monitoring, allowing firms to identify problems before they arise.
As we begin to review the budgets for the new financial year, we can see that the majority of firms are expecting the second half of 2009 to be worse than the second half of 2008. Many are predicting little or no growth with a modest reduction in fee income. There is hope that profitability levels will rise from the heavy overhead reductions made this year. Prudent financial planning is in place in preparation for the unknown.
Having not changed much for the last hundred years, interesting times lay ahead for the legal market. Change is upon us, and many firms are embracing it positively. The firms best able to adapt will be the most successful. Law firms are already becoming more commercially managed and they will continue to develop as a business. The sector will most likely pick up pace, as it is fuelled by external capital and new ownership structures. Consolidation is expected, as smaller firms restructure and merge, and some firms within the top 100 may start to use capital from external shareholders to buy firms with a complementing footprint. We do not expect the change in management structures to significantly alter the way the large-scale international firms operate. However, we anticipate them becoming more innovative with their commercial offering, which may be a result of the firms merging with other services.
Consensus forecasts predict that the market will continue to contract through the rest of 2009, and in 2010 the economy will begin to show signs of recovery at an expected growth rate of 0.7%. In 2011, growth is expected to return to a more normal level in line with the long-term trend of 2.5%. Economists predict the US and Europe will remain large legal markets as Asia grows and contributes generously. As the economy recovers, globalisation will continue to underpin strategies of the largest players.
The new world will see the 'brand' become increasingly more important. Trusted global firms will slowly embed their roots into new pastures across the world. Having an aspirational brand will propel the band of firms below the magic circle into aggressive growth. The next 12 months are likely to remain challenging for firms, and this will undoubtedly present opportunities for those that are well run, well capitalised and well funded.
David Berragan is relationship director for professional services at Barclays Commercial Bank.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat About the Old Partners Who Have No Interest in AI?
Freshfields' Rebrand: Firm Still Committed to Germany, Senior Partner Says
4 minute readWhich Law Firms Have the Most Followers on Social Media?
Trending Stories
- 1What to Know About the New 'Overlapping Directorship' Antitrust Development
- 2'Quiet, Appropriate End:' NY Court of Appeals Formally Removes Erin Gall From Bench
- 3Just One Cookie? Justices to Decide Liability for Half-Truths
- 440% Contingency: A New Ruling Just Cost This Plaintiff Team $827K in Legal Fees
- 5Runners-Up and Shout-Outs for Litigator of the Week
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250