Slaughters gets top marks from associates over bonus
Slaughter and May has emerged as the firm with the most satisfied associates when it comes to salaries and bonuses, according to Legal Week research. Slaughters associates have put the firm at the top of a table grading firms on their combined remuneration packages, marginally ahead of CMS Cameron McKenna.
July 16, 2009 at 04:39 AM
3 minute read
Camerons, Weil and Links associates also back pay and bonus
Slaughter and May has emerged as the firm with the most satisfied associates when it comes to salaries and bonuses, according to Legal Week research.
Slaughters associates have put the firm at the top of a table grading firms on their combined remuneration packages, marginally ahead of CMS Cameron McKenna.
The rankings form part of Legal Week Intelligence's 2009 Employee Satisfaction Survey, which gauged the perceptions of more than 4,000 associates at top 75 law firms in England and Wales and the top 10 US firms in London.
Slaughters is one of a number of City firms which operates a bonus scheme based on salary, without any billable hours targets. The firm amended its scheme to bring in a firmwide bonus paying out 10% of base salary in November 2008.
Its position in the rankings, which comes despite this year matching City moves to freeze salaries, could have been boosted by the fact it has not made any redundancies.
The research found that of the 74 responding Slaughters associates, not one indicated they were looking for another job, compared with more than 10% at its magic circle rivals.
Slaughters senior partner, Chris Saul said: "We aim to pay competitive base salaries and our attitude to bonuses has been to award a flat percentage rate for all associates – an approach which reflects their contribution on a collective basis. It is good to see that there is a positive reaction to our remuneration policies."
Second-placed Camerons bases its salary bands on a range of criteria and operates time-recognition targets for bonuses.
Nigel Moore, Camerons partner in charge of HR, said: "We take people seriously. I have been here for over 20 years and one of the reasons is that we treat people well and continue to put huge effort into doing that."
Dewey & LeBoeuf and Weil Gotshal & Manges had the strongest showing of the US firms, coming in third and fourth place respectively, with Linklaters coming fifth.
Overall, however, satisfaction with bonuses at major law firms generally remains low.
DLA Piper, Walker Morris, Hill Dickinson, Halliwells and Irwin Mitchell make up the lowest scoring firms.
The results are drawn from the 190-page Employee Satisfaction Survey, an annual report produced by Legal Week's independent research arm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpanish Firm Continues Geographical Diversification With Latest Partner Appointments
MoFo Replenishes Singapore Corporate Partner Loss as Lawyer Returns From Gibson Dunn
Trending Stories
- 1Just One Cookie? Justices to Decide Liability for Half-Truths
- 240% Contingency: A New Ruling Just Cost This Lawyer $827K in Legal Fees
- 3Runners-Up and Shout-Outs for Litigator of the Week
- 4Sorry. We Can't Get to Your Case: Judge Speaks Out on Judicial Shortages
- 5Despite Brexit, UK Lawyers Still Dominate on Big EU Antitrust Lawsuits
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250