'100% of the shots you don't take don't go in'
The tough economic climate didn't stop Hannah Gates getting a training contract at a magic circle firm - nor did her decision to work as a tour guide rather than do a vac scheme...
July 20, 2009 at 05:22 AM
4 minute read
The tough economic climate didn't stop Hannah Gates getting a training contract at a magic circle firm – nor did her decision to work as a tour guide rather than do a vac scheme.
We throw our mortarboards in the air, and try to pretend we feel old enough to graduate. Most parents and graduates have the good sense to avoid, at this one moment of celebration and goodbyes, too much mention of the future. The mundane hurdles of packing up three years worth of clothes, books and paraphernalia, securing bank loans, and finding accommodation for next year consume all our capacity to plan and to worry. For those of us aspiring to be law firm trainees, there is simply no time to think about what September holds: whether that is the prospect of facing a life suddenly lacking in direction, or the daunting thought of starting the LPC.
I was one of the lucky ones – I have a training contract lined up at a firm where I can really see myself belonging. Despite my school girl euphoria at being offered the job (carefully disguised long enough to thank the firm's representative professionally, of course), a short-lived but potent desire bubbled up in me to stage a movie-style cut-and-run. Within moments I realised this was ridiculous.
The source of my hesitation? Like so many keen graduates, I don't really have any idea what solicitors actually do. I've read the standard books about 'a day in the life', but the only time I've spent in solicitors' offices has been during my training contract interviews. Instead of doing vacation placements, I worked as a tour guide. It seemed like a good idea at the time. This meant conducting a preliminary phone interview with one of my preferred law firms while hanging out of an ice cream van. I had managed to arrange for my 50 American teenagers to ride the London Eye at the time I was meant to receive the phone call. Having shepherded them onto the wheel, I watched from the bottom, knowing I had exactly 40 minutes to get my interview done before their feet would touch the ground again. Then I realised my phone battery was dying – hence the ice cream van. After some minor flirting and begging the driver to let me plug my dead cell phone into his cigarette-lighter-turned-phone-charger, I waited for the call. I tried to remember why I wanted to be a City trainee, while tuning out the background noise of 'one 99 flake please', balancing a stack of west-end tickets and a giant tour-guide umbrella, and willing the London Eye to keep my tour group in a confined space for a little bit longer.
Given the economic climate, I put in training contract applications expecting them to fail. But, as a British-Canadian, I've grown up with the mantra of ice hockey legend Wayne Gretzky: 'one hundred percent of the shots you don't take don't go in'. When friends tell me they are considering giving up on the dream of joining the ranks of law firm trainees, Gretzky's words flash like warning signs across my mind.
Those of us about to start the LPC still have countless goals to score. It is perhaps fortunate that we remain unaware of what many of those goals truly entail. None of us can possibly know exactly what will be expected of us as trainees. One must simply have faith in our ability to learn quickly. For now, it is enough to say our goodbyes, and find a place to live.
Hannah Gates has a training contract with a magic circle firm and will start the LPC in September.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInternational Arbitration: Key Developments of 2024 and Emerging Trends for 2025
4 minute readThe Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Calculated Push Into Law Firms
5 minute read'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Many LA County Law Firms Remain Open, Mobilize to Support Affected Employees Amid Historic Firestorm
- 2Stevens & Lee Names New Delaware Shareholder
- 3U.S. Supreme Court Denies Trump Effort to Halt Sentencing
- 4From CLO to President: Kevin Boon Takes the Helm at Mysten Labs
- 5How Law Schools Fared on California's July 2024 Bar Exam
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250