LW research finds stark gender divide as female lawyers ditch partner goals
Partnership is losing its lustre for the swelling ranks of female lawyers entering the profession, according to Legal Week research, which shows that barely a third of women aspire to be partners at their own firm. The 2009 Employee Satisfaction Report (ESR) found only 45% of assistants listed partnership with their own firm as their primary career aim, down from 50% the previous year.
July 23, 2009 at 04:46 AM
3 minute read
4,000 surveyed: 45% of assistants aim for partner; one in four want to quit private practice
Partnership is losing its lustre for the swelling ranks of female lawyers entering the profession, according to Legal Week research, which shows that barely a third of women aspire to be partners at their own firm.
The 2009 Employee Satisfaction Report (ESR) found only 45% of assistants listed partnership with their own firm as their primary career aim, down from 50% the previous year.
The findings, based on a survey of 4,020 UK-based qualified solicitors below partner level, reverse a minor rebound in the 2008 ESR when the number of assistants aspiring to partnership increased.
The 2009 report also illustrates the increasingly stark gender divide on the issue. Only 35% of women see partnership with their own firm as their primary career aim, against 58% of male solicitors.
In a related finding, the popularity of senior partner alternative roles has risen sharply. Fifteen percent of respondents listed a partner alternative as their main career goal, against 10% in 2007 and 13% in 2008.
Such roles are particularly popular with women, with 21% seeking a senior non-partner role as their main goal, against 7% for male respondents.
The findings will be taken as evidence that female solicitors see partnership at major City firms as increasingly hard to combine with family aspirations.
"The market will respond to the demand for intermediate roles," said Berwin Leighton Paisner managing partner Neville Eisenberg. "Partner alternatives don't undermine partnership. I think of diversity as a strength, so I see it as strengthening partnership."
Likewise, evidence that lawyers under 30 are turning away from what is seen as an increasingly unattainable goal suggests the partnership model could come up for revision.
The 200-page report, the most comprehensive portrait of the attitudes and priorities of UK lawyers, concludes assistants continue to be dissatisfied with the lifestyle on offer at commercial law firms.
Nearly one in four assistants (23%) said their main aim was to leave private practice, against 19% in last year's survey. The most important of the 37 criteria assistants were asked to judge their firms against was once again 'feeling valued'. The other categories rated in the top five were 'work/life balance', 'culture', 'salary' and 'quality of work'.
Linklaters managing partner Simon Davies commented: "[These results] reflect the challenging circumstances of the past year. We are working with our associates in response to the feedback they have given us and we are launching initiatives in a number of areas, including mentoring and work/life balance."
As expected, the survey found that redundancies at law firms have impacted on the extent to which assistants feel valued, with assistants on average rating their satisfaction on that factor as 6.6 out of 10, against 7 the previous year.
The average figure masks wide divergences between individual firms.
For more details on the standout performers in the survey, [asset_library_tag 50,click here] to download and view profiles of the top-rated firms.
For further information on the 2009 Employee Satisfaction Report, please contact Paul Birk on 020 7316 9864 or email [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
US Judge Allows $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit Against Sierra Leone to Proceed
2 minute readLondon Trial Against BHP Alleges ‘Red Flags’ Leading up to Brazil Mining Disaster Were Ignored
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250