Women failing to crack law's glass ceiling
Women are still substantially underrepresented at senior level in City firms, according to new research with more than half of partners believing the profession has a poor record at retaining female lawyers. The latest Legal Week Big Question survey found more than two thirds of respondents (67%) felt representation of women at a senior level was either 'poor' or 'could be better'.
July 23, 2009 at 04:54 AM
5 minute read
Partners believe firms are failing to retain enough female lawyers in senior positions, while many believe law firms should be doing more to support women in the profession. Emma Sadowski reports
Women are still substantially underrepresented at senior level in City firms, according to new research with more than half of partners believing the profession has a poor record at retaining female lawyers.
The latest Legal Week Big Question survey found more than two thirds of respondents (67%) felt representation of women at a senior level was either 'poor' or 'could be better'.
In contrast, only 5% thought the level of women making it to senior roles was 'excellent'. Thirteen percent thought it was 'good' and 15% judged it to be 'OK'.
General representation of women in the legal profession was felt to be improving, however, according to 65% of the 216 partners responding to the survey, including 31% who thought it was 'good' and 10% who judged it as 'excellent'.
The finding reflects the fact that more woman than men are now entering the profession, though partnerships at major City law firms remain dominated by men.
Allen & Overy (A&O), Herbert Smith, Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP) and Hammonds were the only firms among the UK's top 25 to this year make up a substantial amount of new female partners.
The lack of attainability of partnership as women struggle to combine family commitments with the demands made of senior lawyers is underlined by recent Legal Week research, which found only a third of female lawyers aspired to partnership at their own firm, compared to 58% of men.
Many partners thought law firms need to make more effort to improve the representation of women. Thirty-eight per cent of respondents thought commercial firms 'could do better' at improving female representation, while a further 12% thought their efforts were 'poor'.
Norton Rose London managing partner Deirdre Walker said: "There aren't enough female partners in the profession. One barrier is that the 'anytime, anywhere, any place' performance model is difficult to reconcile with women's double burden – the combination of work and domestic responsibilities – which, in the main, women take the lead responsibility for.
"We can do more to facilitate women in the workplace and to provide the kind of environment that will facilitate success coming through to the partnership."
BLP real estate partner David Battiscombe commented: "We have benefited enormously from introducing flexible arrangements for women with children. We want to attract and retain talented lawyers whatever their gender, but recognise that family commitments can pose particular challenges for women lawyers."
Opinions remain divided on the practicality of combining family life with a senior role in the City.
Sixty-eight percent of the survey's respondents said it was 'challenging' to combine the two, while 10% said a City career and the family aspirations of women were 'not at all' compatible.
However, on the whole respondents believed that the onus was on law firms to be flexible with work schedules to accommodate childcare responsibilities to ensure that the profession retains talented lawyers.
A&O senior partner David Morley commented: "Our biggest challenge is reconciling the demands of our clients for 24/7 service on high-end deals with accommodating the understandable desire of some of our people, not just women, for more flexible work patterns. We think there will need to be some give and take on all sides and our clients should be a part of the discussion."
Opinions were divided, however, on the role of women's networks. While 8% thought they helped 'a great deal', 38% said they help only 'a little' and 23% thought that they were either of 'no use' or 'counter-productive'.
Ashurst finance partner and chair of the firm's diversity committee Helen Burton said: "Our women's network aims to bring awareness to and promote women's issues not only by giving junior and senior female lawyers a chance to meet each other, but also to promote and educate men."
Clare McConnell, head of projects at Stephenson Harwood and chair of the Association of Women Solicitors, said: "Women's networks are hugely helpful in giving women solicitors a chance to discuss a variety of issues, including ways to improve the working environment generally. But we should never exclude the male population from any benefits in working practices."
Partners on women in the profession
- 9% believe firms should make little or no effort to accommodate child-rearing responsibilities
- 10% think the demands of City law firms are 'not compatible' with family aspirations of women
- 23% think the efforts of law firms to improve female representation is 'good' or 'excellent'
- 67% believe representation of women at senior level is 'poor' or 'could be better'.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInternational Arbitration: Key Developments of 2024 and Emerging Trends for 2025
4 minute readThe Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Calculated Push Into Law Firms
5 minute read'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1SDNY US Attorney Damian Williams Lands at Paul Weiss
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Knockout Blow to Latest FCC Net Neutrality Rules After ‘Loper Bright’
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Norton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over Ethnicity Score System
- 5KMPG Wants to Provide Legal Services in the US. Now All Eyes Are on Their Big Four Peers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250