The long and winding road to the criminal Bar
Third six pupil Rebecca Vanstone on her longer than expected journey to tenancy. When I decided to start applying for a third six it was a bit like looking for a needle in a haystack. Although I am constantly told how common it is for pupils to complete a third (or fourth, fifth, even sixth) six these days
July 27, 2009 at 05:28 AM
3 minute read
Third six pupil Rebecca Vanstone on her longer than expected journey to tenancy
When I decided to start applying for a third six it was a bit like looking for a needle in a haystack. Although I am constantly told how common it is for pupils to complete a third (or fourth, fifth, even sixth) six these days, especially in Crime, there isn't a great deal of information out there as to how to get one – although the third six section of the Bar Council website is an increasingly useful resource.
Third sixes are still something of a mystery – they're not regulated by the Bar Council and don't need to be registered. You are simply required to let your Inn of Court and the Bar Council know of your move so they can update your contact details. I assume the thought process behind this is that, as a third six pupil, you have your practising certificate and therefore have completed all the necessary requirements to enable you to 'fly solo'. All well and good, except that the lack of regulation leaves third-sixers open to exploitation. I've heard stories of third sixes being offered purely so that chambers have someone to cover the Saturday courts and any overflow of Magistrates' Court cases during the week, which generally turn out to be few and far between. As third sixes are neither funded (neither by an award nor by way of guaranteed earnings), nor offered with a view to tenancy, chambers have nothing to lose by offering them. Thankfully I'm not in this position; I'm completing a third six at a set where there's a lot of work at the very junior end, I'm in court every day and I frequently cover cases in the Crown Court for senior colleagues.
My experience is that completing a third six is exactly the same as completing a second six – you're still assigned to a pupil supervisor who you carry out work for – except you are probably more comfortable on your feet and may be trusted with more difficult cases as you're deemed to have more experience than the second sixers.
I didn't apply for tenancy at the set where I completed my twelve-month pupillage and so took a gamble by leaving. I often wonder what my next step will be if I'm not offered tenancy at my current set at the end of my third six (although really it's a 'third-twelve' as tenancy applications can only be made annually, in April). I've met numerous barristers who were taken on as tenants after moving three or four times which, although encouraging, means the road to tenancy could turn out to be much longer than I'd hoped.
Rebecca Vanstone is a third six pupil at 3 Temple Gardens
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWill a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to This Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Dominated by Small Cap Listings
X-odus: Why Germany’s Federal Court of Justice and Others Are Leaving X
Mexican Lawyers On Speed-Dial as Trump Floats ‘Day One’ Tariffs
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250