Those drinks are free, you know…
It's easy to see vac schemes as a bit of a jolly. A few weeks of being wined and dined, meeting lots of new people, and generally taking the positives from life in a law firm without really having to do any of the hard grind. But for those who are wise enough, they can and should be much more than that.
July 28, 2009 at 04:20 AM
4 minute read
Ex-magic circle trainee Dominic Webb explains how to make the most of a vacation scheme
It's easy to see vac schemes as a bit of a jolly. A few weeks of being wined and dined, meeting lots of new people, and generally taking the positives from life in a law firm without really having to do any of the hard grind. But for those who are wise enough, they can and should be much more than that.
If you're embarking on a vac scheme this summer, allow me a moment to impart a few words of (questionable) wisdom. First, if you're really interested in finding out what it's like, HR aren't going to tell you. The trainees that they wheel out at drinks events probably won't tell you either, unless they've had a few too many. Partners certainly won't tell you – in fact, many partners don't have their eyes open enough to have a clue what it's like for their juniors anyway.
No, if you really want to know what it's like, then look beyond the marketing to the real people around you, particularly the trainees and junior associates away from the HR glare. Do they look happy in their jobs? A bit tired? Utterly drained? Unbearably stressed? Or maybe they're bored?
And what are the trainees actually doing with their time? After all, that'll be you. They might tell you how important they feel managing part of a big deal themselves, but does that actually involve sitting in a room sorting through dozens of folders from morning til night?
There is a huge amount to be gained from going on a vac scheme. Naturally, many vac schemers will see it as a chance to impress a prospective employer, particularly given the current market, and this is undoubtedly true. But it is also an unparalleled opportunity to see if the firm, and indeed the law, is really for you.
With hindsight, I got a bit carried away with the glamour during my vac scheme. The barrage of socialising and free drinks, the facilities, the big money deals, the London living – it was all pretty exciting for a student not used to any of those things. Looking back, the supervisor I sat with was overworked and miserable. Somehow I didn't seem to notice at the time.
Not that noticing would have changed my decision to apply. But for those less sure of what they want, or with other options, it's a lesson worth bearing in mind. Keep an open mind and those eyes peeled.
Another thing you might not be aware of is that departments within the same firm, particularly at the big firms, can vary enormously. The differences in ethos can be like being in entirely different organisations. Indeed, your experience in real estate is unlikely to square with what others are seeing in a big transactional department. So talk not only to the people in your department, but to your fellow vac schemers.
And above all, it's worth remembering that a lot of law firms are going through some real turmoil at the moment. People are worried about their jobs and colleagues have been laid off, while loads of people have virtually nothing to do. In short, now is a pretty unusual time to be visiting a law firm. Perhaps ask the lawyers not just what it's like to work there at the moment, but what it was like in the years of plenty. Hopefully, by the time today's vac schemers are starting their training contracts, the good – if hard-working – times will be back.
Lastly, despite all of what I've said, do remember to try and have some fun. Making the most of your vac scheme should not and does not prevent that. Those drinks are free, you know…
Dominic Webb (name changed) is a solicitor at a private client firm
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWill a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to This Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Dominated by Small Cap Listings
X-odus: Why Germany’s Federal Court of Justice and Others Are Leaving X
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250