Middle East, India and Islamic finance: Equal under the law
Since the 2003 US-led invasion, foreigners have enjoyed immunity from all legal processes in Iraq whether criminal, civil, administrative or bureaucratic. Even driving on the roads, foreigners were granted the right of way - but no more. With the Iraqi government and people resuming authority over their cities, the rule of law is being restored.
July 30, 2009 at 06:10 AM
6 minute read
With Iraq reconstructing its government and law system following the 2003 fall of Saddam Hussein's regime, foreign companies have been largely immune to Iraqi law. 1 January saw this change. Nadia Salem reports
Since the 2003 US-led invasion, foreigners have enjoyed immunity from all legal processes in Iraq whether criminal, civil, administrative or bureaucratic. Even driving on the roads, foreigners were granted the right of way – but no more. With the Iraqi government and people resuming authority over their cities, the rule of law is being restored.
The absence of Iraqi rule over foreigners may have led to the popular misconception that Iraq is lawless, but the opposite is true. The earliest written laws are to be found in this region (thanks to Hammurabi), however, twentieth century life necessitated a modern codified law. In 1951, Iraq enacted its civil code, which was drafted by Abd El-Razzak El-Sanhuri, the famed Egyptian jurist who had written the Egyptian Civil Code using French law as a model. In 1969 and 1971 respectively, the Penal Code and Criminal Procedure were decreed into law.
Following to the toppling of Saddam Hussein's regime in 2003, the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) made amendments to the Penal Code; for example, suspending the laws against insulting the President of Iraq, criminal acts that would result in capital punishment and capital punishment itself (although this was reinstated in 2004). In addition, punishment for certain heinous crimes and crimes against public utilities were increased to a maximum of life imprisonment.
The Authority also enacted CPA Order 17, which granted all foreigners with government contracts broad immunity from Iraqi law and jurisdiction. However, this immunity came to a silent, if not questionable, end on 1 January 2009, when the US signed the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with Iraq that, among other things, restored Iraqi authority over foreign contractors and removed their immunity.
As a result, foreigners and international entities are unaware of the change in their immunity status that is now governed by Iraqi law. Because of the confusion created by the implied suspension of Order 17, Iraq's Ministry of Interior issued an order stating that no legal action will be taken against US contractors in the areas of licensing security companies; registration of firearms and weaponry; vehicle registration; licensing pilots and aircrafts relating to security operations; customs, duties, taxes and inspections; and entry and exit procedures.
The Ministry's order, which halted the enforcement of the SOFA agreement against US contractors, was for a limited and unspecified period until a newly assembled Ministry committee could meet and issue recommendations on how to implement the SOFA.
More recently, foreign contractors in the International Zone (IZ; formerly known as the Green Zone) have been receiving visits from the Iraqi police. This is a direct consequence of SOFA, which stipulated that the US-controlled IZ be restored to Iraqi governance. As a result, the Iraqi police set out to determine the legality of all foreign occupiers in the IZ. Typically, foreign companies are being asked to produce the following list of information:
- company name and address;
- manager of the company;
- name of the company's legal representative;
- company's nationality;
- letter of acceptance from the secretariat of the Council of Ministries;
- letter of acceptance from the National Security Department;
- company registration certificate;
- property title deed;
- lease agreement;
- area size of the property that the company occupies;
- company articles of association, initial minutes of meeting and other relevant documents;
- company specialisation;
- number of foreign and Arab employees;
- number of Iraqi employees;
- list of other company branches in the IZ; and
- inventory of weapons at the company's disposal.
Documents supporting this information must be presented to the National Security Department. Interestingly, the result of increased police activity is that many foreign companies are becoming registered entities of Iraq. However, it is worth noting that foreign companies which cannot produce the required documentary evidence may be asked to cease business until it can be produced.
In general, foreign companies can choose to have a representative office, a branch office, a limited liability company and joint stock company. In addition, foreign companies and foreigners can have 100% ownership of a limited liability company or joint stock company. However, a representative office is not permitted to engage in any commercial activity, while a branch office may do so to the extent of its contract with the Iraqi government. It is illegal to act in the name of a company that is not correctly registered.
It takes up to three months to set up a company in Iraq, however, with approval of the National Security Department, foreign companies may be allowed to continue to operate with evidence that the registration process has started.
In addition to affecting the rights of foreign entities, foreign individuals are well advised to know their rights under Iraqi law. An accused person (foreign or local) has the right to legal representation which will be appointed if the accused cannot afford a representative.
The accused must not to be coerced into a confession by any means including mistreatment, threats, enticement, promises, psychological influence, use of drugs, torture or cruel, degrading or inhuman treatment. Interrogation of an accused should take place within 24 hours of arrest and the person may be held in custody for a maximum of 15 days during the investigation of the crime.
Companies are criminally liable for offences committed by employees, directors or agents and may be fined as a result. A police officer is duty-bound to report a crime to the magistrate, who is responsible for the initial investigation of the crime, following the French model. The magistrate may compel a plaintiff or defendant to be subjected to a physical examination. With a search order, the magistrate may search a house or business.
If the magistrate finds that there is sufficient evidence for a trial, the case and the accused will be moved to the relevant penal court for trial. However, if the magistrate finds that the evidence is insufficient for trial, the accused will be released and the case closed. When a criminal complaint is rejected, the defendant is immediately released from custody.
There is nuance and complexity in Iraqi law, particularly now as Iraq emerges from the destruction of war and enters the reconstruction phase. At a time when much of the rest of the world is experiencing economic loss, the Iraqi economy is expanding quickly and its legal system has finally been applied to all who live in the country, regardless of status. Both companies and individuals seeking to do business in Iraq must now, for the first time in five years, understand the laws of the country and their implications as an integral part of project and business planning.
Nadia Salem is legal team leader of the Iraq practice at AL Tamimi & Company.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWill a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to This Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Dominated by Small Cap Listings
X-odus: Why Germany’s Federal Court of Justice and Others Are Leaving X
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250