Heller bankruptcy court report alleges $9m profits cover-up
A bankruptcy court report has alleged that Heller Ehrman last year distributed $9m (£5.5m) in profits that the now-defunct firm did not have. According to the interim status report, in early 2008, someone at Heller instructed its accounting department to distribute the $9m and then cover it up.
August 11, 2009 at 08:43 AM
2 minute read
A bankruptcy court report has alleged that Heller Ehrman last year distributed $9m (£5.5m) in profits that the now-defunct firm did not have.
According to the interim status report, in early 2008, someone at Heller instructed its accounting department to distribute the $9m and then cover it up.
In addition, in late 2007 Heller printed 118 cheques made out for $3m (£1.8m) in total to pay for expenses. The firm then placed a hold on the cheques and did not let them clear until early 2008, the report says.
The information is the result of investigations by the creditors committee. The report indicates it believes Heller's management was making these "very troubling business decisions" to boost its 2007 numbers.
"Whatever the rationale, the reality was that Heller boosted its 2007 financial numbers at the expense of the 2008 numbers, even though 2008 looked to be an even worse year for the firm's revenues," the report says.
The $9m in overstated profits was originally recorded as "excess distributions," but the accounting department was told to record them instead as "shareholder loans," the report says.
It is unclear whether shareholders knew these were loans or not.
When an accountant tried to inform shareholders in writing of the 'loans', he was told not to, the report alleges. Bank of America believes Heller never intended to collect on the loans, the report says.
The estate also believes its former shareholders owe it $106m (£64m) – the total that partners received as profit distributions in 2007 and 2008.
Thomas Willoughby, who represents the creditors committee, declined to say who instructed the accountants or whether the estate would target that person or people in court.
"We filed it to inform the court, the creditors, and parties in interest of the status of our investigation," Willoughby said, declining further comment because of confidentiality agreements.
This article first appeared on the Legal Pad blog on The Recorder's website.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Heavyweights Wrestle in High-Stakes Sale of Venezuela’s Citgo
Cleary vs. White & Case: NYC Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy
Singapore's Drew & Napier Secures $3.5B Award in Civil Suit
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250