Work/life imbalance
The City can seriously damage your family life, says ex-magic circle trainee Dominic Webb...I took a lot from my training with a magic circle firm. I made a lot of close friends, left on good terms with my colleagues, and for those who are wondering, was made an offer to qualify there. In short, I have no axe to grind.
September 01, 2009 at 08:38 AM
4 minute read
The City can seriously damage your family life, says ex-magic circle trainee Dominic Webb
I took a lot from my training with a magic circle firm. I made a lot of close friends, left on good terms with my colleagues, and for those who are wondering, was made an offer to qualify there. In short, I have no axe to grind.
Nevertheless, during my time in the City I noticed many things about the culture of the big law firms that I perceived to be negative, particularly from the point of view of an employee. Those things ultimately resulted in my leaving corporate law for good.
It seems that a lawyer in the big firms has virtually no escape. It's not just that any given evening or weekend might be ruined, but that the important ones might be ruined. Even in the run up to holidays you face the possibility that your holiday might be cancelled (in truth this happens pretty rarely, but the fact that it happens at all is enough to make you aware of the threat). Everyone expects to work long hours when they join a big firm, but the 24/7 all-encompassing nature of City law firm life is difficult to properly appreciate – until you actually live through it.
I knew an associate who had a young family – a wife and a child just one month old. A nice guy, he was clearly a committed family man. He was extremely efficient at his work so that he could leave the office in good time to support his wife and newborn baby. After all, they both needed him around. Surely his employer should bear this in mind?
You can probably guess where the story goes from here. The partners in his department (he was not a transactional lawyer) put him on their element of an absolutely enormous transaction – big even by magic circle standards. It was clear from the outset that everybody on it would be working crazy hours, and so it proved. He spent a whole month – the second month of his child's life – working until late every evening and both days at the weekend. He barely saw his wife or his baby for that whole time.
I thought this was plain wrong. What planet were the partners on? How could they give so little thought to the welfare of a liked and respected employee, and those who depended on him? It is one thing to ask someone to work very hard, but this was something else.
I concluded that I didn't want to live like that. Among my intake, I was far from alone.
So, to what extent is it justifiable for law firms to expect their employees to put work above everything else in their lives, no matter how unreasonable the demands? The experience of that associate would almost certainly not occur in the 'real world'. Does the very good money that City lawyers are paid really give employers carte blanche to demand whatever they want from them?
Perhaps, you might say, the answer is simple. If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.
Fine, so be it. But in return I'll show you loads of good, young, highly-trained lawyers just waiting for an economic upturn so that they can get 'out of the kitchen' themselves. For those big firms, that has to be a problem worth addressing.
Dominic Webb (name changed) is a solicitor at a private client firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG Moves to Provide Legal Services in the US—Now All Eyes Are on Its Big Four Peers
International Arbitration: Key Developments of 2024 and Emerging Trends for 2025
4 minute readThe Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Calculated Push Into Law Firms
5 minute read'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250