Intel general counsel steps down in wake of record EC fine
Intel general counsel Bruce Sewell has resigned "to pursue other opportunities" as part of a management shakeup at the company, reports Corporate Counsel. Deputy general counsel Suzan Miller is now serving as interim head of Intel's law department, which employs 600 lawyers in more than 30 countries. Intel has announced that it is reorganising its business units and shifting more power to three executive vice presidents. As a result, CEO Paul Otellini will spend more time on corporate strategy and the company's new growth initiatives.
September 15, 2009 at 05:54 AM
2 minute read
Intel general counsel Bruce Sewell has resigned "to pursue other opportunities" as part of a management shakeup at the company, reports Corporate Counsel.
Deputy general counsel Suzan Miller is now serving as interim head of Intel's law department, which employs 600 lawyers in more than 30 countries.
Intel has announced that it is reorganising its business units and shifting more power to three executive vice presidents. As a result, CEO Paul Otellini will spend more time on corporate strategy and the company's new growth initiatives.
Sewell became Intel's general counsel in November 2004, replacing Thomas Dunlap, who retired after 30 years with the company. One of Sewell's biggest challenges was fighting charges by various government agencies that Intel violated antitrust laws.
In May, the European Commission hit Intel with a record-breaking €1.06bn (£936m) fine for offering illegal rebates to computer makers that used fewer or no chips from its main competitor, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), which brought the initial complaint against Intel in Europe in 2001. Intel has said it is appealing the decision.
After the ruling, Sewell insisted that Intel had never paid to prevent AMD products from reaching the European market. "At no point has there ever been any kind of naked payment by Intel," said Sewell. "The issue is whether the rebates we offered were conditional, and our position very definitely is that they were not."
Sewell joined Intel in 1995 as a senior attorney, advising various business groups on matters such as antitrust compliance, licensing and intellectual property. In 2001, he was promoted to deputy general counsel and managed Intel's litigation portfolio. He also handled corporate transactions, including M&A activities.
Before going in-house at Intel, Sewell worked on high-profile litigation for other technology giants as a partner at Phoenix-based firm Brown & Bain, which merged with Seattle-based Perkins Coie in 2004. While there, he handled several high-profile cases, including copyright disputes between Apple and Microsoft.
Corporate Counsel is a US sister title of Legal Week.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
Pinsent Masons Launches AML Artificial Intelligence Tool in Wake of SRA Crackdown
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250