DLA Piper settles payment issues with Middle East client
DLA Piper has resolved payment issues with a significant Middle East client, recouping an outstanding seven-figure sum. The international law firm worked out a payment plan with the Dubai-based company earlier this year and is understood to have been paid all of the outstanding fees in full over the summer.
September 30, 2009 at 06:43 AM
2 minute read
DLA settles fee dispute and launches Middle East pro bono venture
DLA Piper has resolved payment issues with a significant Middle East client, recouping an outstanding seven-figure sum.
The international law firm worked out a payment plan with the Dubai-based company earlier this year and is understood to have been paid all of the outstanding fees in full over the summer.
The firm is still working with the client, which Legal Week reported in April owed DLA Piper the money for fees run up between January and September 2008. At that time, one former DLA Piper lawyer claimed the problem was enough to affect local profit distributions. However, the firm denied that distributions were affected.
News of the fee repayment comes as DLA moves to expand a lawyer secondment program launched in its Abu Dhabi office during the financial downturn.
The initiative combines cost-saving efforts with pro bono work, with the firm offering Middle East associates a six-month sabbatical at reduced pay. Those taking a sabbatical receive around 25% of standard pay, but those taking a sabbatical with a pro bono organisation will receive between 25% and 50% of pay as well as having their rent paid by the firm.
Launched in May this year by office managing partner Stephen Webb, the program has seen two Abu Dhabi-based associates sent to the war-torn East Timor for a three-month and a six-month placement respectively. DLA Piper now hopes to continue the program on a firm-wide basis.
Webb said: "Work levels in the UAE dropped significantly earlier this year and the project came about as we looked for different ways to respond to the cost-cutting pressure. The success of the project means we want to expand it to the rest of the firm to see if it can be continued on a permanent basis."
As a result of the financial crisis, DLA Piper's Middle East practice has completed two redundancy consultations earlier this year, mainly affecting Dubai. In addition, the firm placed a significant number of associates on client secondments.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMcKinsey Subsidiary to Pay Over $122 Million to Settle US Investigation into South Africa Bribery Case
Gibson Dunn, Linklaters Advise on Talabat’s $2BN IPO in World’s Largest Tech IPO of 2024
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250