Freshfields reshuffles corporate: can the winning streak continue?
Good bench, strength in depth, sensible management and flair - you would be forgiven for thinking Deal Week has lapsed into football punditry. But even if it can't match the glamour of the Premier League there's one team that currently gets City lawyers reaching for the sporting superlatives: Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer's on-form corporate practice.
October 20, 2009 at 03:44 AM
3 minute read
The biggest challenge facing Braham and co will be keeping complacency at bay
Good bench, strength in depth, sensible management and flair – you would be forgiven for thinking Deal Week has lapsed into football punditry. But even if it can't match the glamour of the Premier League there's one team that currently gets City lawyers reaching for the sporting superlatives: Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer's on-form corporate practice.
Perhaps the biggest sign of success for a practice that has re-invented itself twice in the past decade – the Bruckhaus merger and a restructuring in 2005 – is that the plaudits come not from the firm's PR machine, but the mouths of its closest rivals.
With the firm once again reshuffling the management of its corporate practice, the question will be whether the firm can maintain its four-year run of excellence.
A good deal of Freshfields' recent success can be traced to 2005 when Tim Jones called in three of its most prominent lawyers and, as one partner puts it, "got us moving in the same direction," across M&A, private equity, securities and financial institutions work. The shake-up, which saw Jones, Mark Rawlinson, Ed Braham and Will Lawes take on four London sub-teams, was greeted with near-derision by rivals, but proved to be successful in helping the firm to shake itself out of a period of inertia. At this time, the firm took a hard look in the mirror and didn't like what it saw – a mood that also led to streamlined, firmwide practice management and its partnership restructuring in 2006-07.
The corporate shake-up also underlined a shift in culture, emphasising business-winning and moving quickly on opportunities. As such, corporate has continued to spot trends early – seen by its success in positioning itself in the past two years for restructuring work and shoring up its relationship with banks ahead of the credit crunch.
Also extremely helpful has been the sustained strength of its German corporate practice, which has made maximum benefit of a national legal market that has held up better during the downturn then many Western economies.
Freshfields also argues it has established the only Europe corporate practice that is pre-eminent in public M&A, private equity and equity capital markets.
What next then as the firm reshuffles its leadership roles? Braham, as head of corporate, is expected to maintain a consensual style at the firm. Chris Bown, who did an excellent job of quietly organising Freshfields' private equity practice after joining from Baker & McKenzie, looks a safe pair of hands to take over 'team B', which is heavily focused on sponsor clients. Philip Richards, taking over 'team A', which focuses on funds and regulatory for financial institutions, also brings a solid pedigree.
Whatever the structure, the focus on business-winning will remain with the firm expressing a desire to claim more FTSE scalps in the near future. An early victory on that front was Freshfields' recent appointment as BT's main adviser – displacing Linklaters.
The firm also looks very well stocked with corporate partners coming into their prime to complement the older guard. Among them Julian Makin and Simon Witty's much-touted capital markets team, as well as Andrew Hutchings, Claire Wills and Ben Spiers, that latter credited with the BT success. Risking a last sporting cliche, their eyes would appear to be firmly on the ball.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Data Breach Lawsuit Against Byte Federal Among 1,500 Targeting Companies in 2024
- 2Counterfeiters Ride Surge in Tabletop Games’ Popularity, Challenging IP Owners to Keep Up
- 3Health Care Data Breach Class Actions Saw December Surge in NY Courts
- 4Florida Supreme Court Disbars 3, Suspends 11, Reprimands 1 in Final Disciplinary Order of 2024
- 5Chief Justice Roberts Ends Year With Defense Against 'Illegitimate' Attacks on Judiciary
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250