Commentary: J'accuse! The battle over Google books hits Europe
The legal wrangling over Google Books - the internet giant's wildly ambitious project to become one of the largest libraries and booksellers in the world - has taken on an international flavour. In late September a French publisher accused the ubiquitous search engine of breaking French copyright law in its effort to scan millions of books. Debate is now taking off across Europe.
November 04, 2009 at 06:09 AM
3 minute read
Google's plan for a digital book monopoly is hotly contested by European publishers
The legal wrangling over Google Books – the internet giant's wildly ambitious project to become one of the largest libraries and booksellers in the world – has taken on an international flavour. In late September a French publisher accused the ubiquitous search engine of breaking French copyright law in its effort to scan millions of books. Debate is now taking off across Europe.
Since 2005, Google has been inching its way toward – but not quite reaching – a settlement with authors and publishers that would give Google Book Search the right to scan and display millions of copyrighted books. At the time of writing, Google was scrambling to make changes to reach a settlement with parties including the Authors Guild and a bevy of copyright holders. But while the parties are still negotiating in the US, a suit in France is moving forward. Les Editions de La Martiniere filed a suit in France in 2006 to stop Google's scanning operation, claiming that even though the vast majority of the scanning is done in the US, the law being broken is French. "It is an infernal machine, it never stops. It is a disgrace. It is cultural rape," huffed Serge Eyrolles, in the best tradition of French aesthetes, at a press conference in September. Eyrolles is the president of the Syndicat National de l'Edition, a group of French publishers that supports the litigation.
The publisher wants $25m (£15.3m) in damages, fines of around $150,000 (£91,700) for every reference to a La Martiniere book on Google Book Search and $150,000 for every day that the books remain online after a judgment is handed down. Google's lawyer, Herbert Smith partner Alexandra Neri, is having none of it. She describes Eyrolles' outburst as "a declaration from a Greek tragedy," adding prosaically: "New internet services often draw passion."
The crux is whether French or US copyright law should apply, says Yann Colin of Paris boutique Franklin, who represents La Martiniere and writers group the Societe des Gens de Lettres. Soon after Google started scanning books in the US in 2004, chief executive officer Eric Schmidt announced that the company was taking advantage of the 'fair use' doctrine, which enabled it to make available online an excerpt from every scanned book without the publishers' permission. The concept doesn't exist under French law.
France isn't the only European country upset by Google's project, which critics claim will effectively create a monopoly on digital access to books, including those written by Europeans. Germany has also taken issue with the proposed settlement on a number of grounds. Separately, recent news from the European Commission suggests Brussels may finally start revising copyright laws across the union to make digital book distribution easier. Given the current gridlock in the US, it could even be possible for Europe to take the lead in creating relevant legislation or an alternative digital library.
Isabel Davies, senior partner of CMS Cameron McKenna's intellectual property team, comments: "This is a catalyst for copyright in the digital arena to change. The battle lines have been drawn and some complex issues are now in the spotlight, so it has to be taken forward. The EU has an opportunity to take the lead."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Combative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump
4 minute readLaw Firms 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs: Davis Wright Tremaine, Wilmer and More
- 2Forum Clause Axes $844M Case Against Reinsurer Over Deadly Plane Crash, Judge Rules
- 3Latham Adds Former Treasury Department Lawyer for Cross-Border Deal Guidance
- 4Understanding the HEMS Standard in Trusts
- 5Mergers Are About People, Not Paperwork: Here’s Why
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250