Former DLA Piper partner faces forgery trial in Singapore
A former DLA Piper partner who left in 2006 to open a Singapore office for US firm Duane Morris is standing trial for forgery, writes The American Lawyer. Rudy Lim, 37, has been charged with falsely inflating his pay at DLA to obtain a better salary at Duane Morris.
November 04, 2009 at 06:31 AM
3 minute read
A former DLA Piper partner who left in 2006 to open a Singapore office for US firm Duane Morris is standing trial for forgery, writes The American Lawyer.
Rudy Lim, 37, has been charged with falsely inflating his pay at DLA to obtain a better salary at Duane Morris.
Lim is accused of forging a payroll statement from DLA to show that his monthly drawings from the firm were $65,000 (£39,400) instead of $25,000 (£15,100), which would boost his annual pay from $300,000 (£182,000) at DLA to $780,000 (£472,000) at Duane Morris.
The Straits Times of Singapore reports that in January 2007, Lim began drawing $58,200 (£35,200) a month from his new firm – an annual salary of $698,400 (£423,000) before taxes. But the pay increase would only be temporary.
DLA Piper employees looking at electronic records stored on Lim's computer found the forged payroll statement and alerted Singapore's Commercial Affairs Department. Lim resigned from Duane Morris in May 2007 after finding out about the investigation, The Straits Times reports.
In Singapore, a forgery conviction carries a sentence of up to seven years in prison and a fine.
Lim, born in Indonesia of Chinese extraction, is admitted as a solicitor and barrister in Australia and as a solicitor in England and Wales. He previously worked at White & Case and Baker & McKenzie.
At DLA Piper, Lim advised public and private companies on cross-border and domestic M&A, foreign direct investments and joint ventures. He made partner at DLA in February 2006 and chaired the firm's Indonesia practice.
After the forgery charges against Lim were made public, the UK Solicitors Regulation Authority issued a report in March 2008 which found that Lim deliberately created a false document to aid him in salary negotiations with Duane Morris.
Lim defended himself at a disciplinary hearing, claiming he did not forge the payroll document for personal gain and that the accusations should not affect his professional standing. However, the Law Society disagreed and disbarred him.
Bernard Doray of Singapore firm Bernard & Rada is representing Lim in the trial, which began on Monday (2 November). Lim is currently free on $80,000 (£48,400) bail.
Doray did not immediately respond to a request for comment. DLA and Duane Morris declined to comment.
This article first appeared on The Am Law Daily blog on americanlawyer.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Leaders Stress the Importance of the Rule of Law Amid Geopolitical Tensions
Can Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Trending Stories
- 1Amex Latest Target as Regulators Scrutinize Whether Credit Card Issuers Deliver on Rewards Promises
- 2Vedder Price Shareholder Javier Lopez Appointed to Miami Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board
- 3Wells Fargo and Bank of America Agree to Pay Combined $60 Million to Settle SEC Probe
- 4Legaltech Rundown: Robin AI Releases In-house Tool, Epona Merges With JustiSolutions, and More
- 5As Lawmakers Eye Need for NY Supreme Court Posts, Could a Ballot Question Remove the Constitutional Limit?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250