Bar regulator gives approval for barristers to join LDPs
The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has given the go-ahead for barristers to work in new business structures set out in the Legal Services Act (LSA). After a long period of deliberation, the BSB announced today (20 November) that members of the Bar will be permitted to enter into Legal Disciplinary Partnerships (LDPs) without having to requalify as a solicitor.
November 20, 2009 at 08:32 AM
3 minute read
The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has given the go-ahead for barristers to work in new business structures set out in the Legal Services Act (LSA).
After a long period of deliberation, the BSB announced today (20 November) that members of the Bar will be permitted to enter into Legal Disciplinary Partnerships (LDPs) without having to requalify as a solicitor.
However, the BSB is discouraging barristers from taking a shareholding in LDPs until specific guidance on conflicts has been established.
The decision will also permit barristers to enter into 'barrister only practices' which will see barristers form partnerships with risk spread across all members in the entity. Currently, barristers practising in chambers are self-employed.
However, the BSB has made no decision as yet on whether members of the Bar will be allowed to enter into Alternative Business Structures (ABS) – which are set to come into force in mid-2011 – and is planning a further consultation on this next year.
The consultation will look at whether the cab-rank rule – which requires barristers to accept cases brought to them – can be modified to apply to barristers practising as mangers of LDPs.
BSB chair Baroness Deech said: "The Board's decision today is of considerable significance for the future of legal services provision in England and Wales. It represents the culmination of more than two years' careful consideration of the issues, guided by the overriding concern to regulate in the public interest."
She added: "This has been a difficult undertaking. We know that feelings and opinions are very strongly held on all sides of this debate. As a responsible regulator we have balanced the views and come to conclusions, giving living effect to the regulatory objectives of the LSA and just as importantly, to the spirit they embody."
Nicholas Green QC, chairman-elect of the Bar Council said: "The Bar Council very much welcomes these changes. The BSB's decisions represent an historic moment for the Bar."
LDPs form a key plank of the LSA and allow firms to add non-lawyers to their partnerships, up to a cap of 25% of total partner count.
LDPs have been permissible since March this year, although the BSB has, until now, made no decision on whether barristers may join this new structure. The decision follows three consultations after the formation of a working group in 2007 to look into various aspects of the impact of the LSA.
Click here to join Legal Week's LinkedIn In-house lawyers group
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHSF Defends Bayer on Roundup Class Action as Litigation Comes to an End in Australia
2 minute readNorton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over 'Unreasonable' Ethnicity Score System
3 minute readBirkenstocks: Footwear or Fine Art? German Law Firm SKW Schwarz Steps Up in Court
Freshfields and Quinn Emanuel Face Off in Latest JP Morgan-WeRealize Dispute
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250