Linklaters and Addleshaws head up building society merger deal
Linklaters and Addleshaw Goddard have taken the lead roles on the proposed merger of Yorkshire and Chelsea building societies. Linklaters advised Yorkshire, with City corporate partner Stephen Blackshaw leading on corporate aspects while capital markets partner Richard Levy led on the capital exchange.
December 02, 2009 at 07:54 AM
2 minute read
Linklaters and Addleshaw Goddard have taken the lead roles on the proposed merger of Yorkshire and Chelsea building societies.
Linklaters advised Yorkshire, with City corporate partner Stephen Blackshaw leading on corporate aspects while capital markets partner Richard Levy led on the capital exchange.
Financial services partner Adam Bennett, an experienced building society adviser, led the Addleshaws team advising Chelsea, alongside banking and finance partner Mark Thomas.
It is understood that Allen & Overy (A&O), Yorkshire's longstanding adviser, was unable to take a role due to commercial conflicts.
The merger, which is expected to go ahead by 1 April 2010 subject to regulatory and shareholder approval, will significantly strengthen Yorkshire's position as the second-largest building society in Britain, with the combined entity to have assets of £35bn and a total of 178 branches.
The combination will be called Yorkshire Building Society, with the Chelsea Building Society name retained and operated as a separate brand within the group and with Yorkshire's top management remaining at the helm.
The merger comes in response to significant losses by both societies in the financial downturn. Yorkshire announced a loss of £15m in the six months running up to 30 June this year, while Chelsea lost £19m in the same time period.
Previous advisers to Chelsea include Salans and A&O.
Addleshaws had advised on 13 of the latest building society mergers running up to Nationwide's takeover of Derbyshire and Cheshire building societies last year, where A&O advised Nationwide while Addleshaw acted for both targets.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKim & Chang, Freshfields, A&O Shearman Take Top Spots for Highest Collective Deal Value as APAC M&A Grew By Just 1% in 2024
Blocking of $14B Nippon US Steel Deal Will Not Dampen Japan-U.S. M&A, Lawyers Say
Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. But Geopolitical Uncertainty Could Slow M&A Growth in 2025
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Lessons Learned from the Pager Attack: the Law of War, Warfighting, and the Weaponization of the Supply Chain
- 2Splits Among the Departments: What Might Be Ripe for the Court of Appeals
- 3Recent Developments Section 1782 Litigation and the Attorney-Client Privilege
- 4Biden's Lower Federal Court Bench Legacy
- 5Legal Finance at 15: Research Reveals What’s Fueling Growth and What’s Next
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250