Bar urges chambers to offer clients a 'one-stop shop' to compete with solicitors
Bar Council chair champions radical proposals to have chambers' business units manage clients directly
January 13, 2010 at 06:14 AM
3 minute read
New Bar Council chairman Nicholas Green QC is urging chambers to set up separate business units to help them compete with solicitors to win work from clients.
The groundbreaking initiative would see individual chambers encouraged to set up business units, called 'procurecos', which would be used as a means of winning work direct from companies and public bodies, cutting out the solicitors who generally serve as middlemen between chambers and clients.
Each procureco would bring together barristers with solicitors and other professions, like accounting firms, effectively enabling chambers to offer a one-stop shop to clients at a cheaper rate than solicitors.
The move would reverse the traditional referral system that sees solicitors appoint chambers on behalf of clients and would put more control in the hands of the Bar, with each procureco effectively operating a number of panels for different professions.
The procurecos would source rather than supply work, allowing solicitors and barristers working under the umbrella units to remain regulated as individuals by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and the Bar Standards Board (BSB) respectively.
However, if the BSB were to opt to become an entity-based regulator under changes introduced through the Legal Services Act, the units could start supplying work through a fixed roster of solicitors.
Green, who took up his post on 1 January, kicked off a series of roadshows to publicise the initiative earlier this week (11 January), telling Legal Week that he hoped some could be in place as early as next month.
Green said: "The Bar has a cost advantage compared to many firms of solicitors. Last year we thought procurecos might just apply to the publicly funded Bar but we realised this is something the commercial Bar can take advantage of as well."
He added: "The advantage of a procureco is that the Bar will still maintain its traditional look and feel. This is a bolt-on that can be set up easily and effectively so the Bar can offer a one-stop shop to clients."
The new structure is waiting for approval from the Legal Services Board. The BSB is set to consult this year on alternative business structures following the approval in November of legal disciplinary partnerships that will allow barristers to work in solicitors' firms without re-qualifying.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAviation Attorney and Pilot Analyzes Jeju Air Crash, Potential Litigation Issues
Baker & Partners, LCWP Lead on $1B Fraud Claim by Malaysia's 1MDB Against Amicorp
Apple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250