Mills & Reeve link-up with Manches breaks down after talks over office merger
Manches' Oxford office and Mills & Reeve have broken off talks about a potential tie-up. The two firms entered into discussions last year that could have seen Manches' entire 25-partner Oxford office joining the top 50 national firm. The deal would have handed Mills & Reeve its seventh UK office alongside Birmingham, Cambridge, Leeds, London, Manchester and Norwich.
January 13, 2010 at 06:13 AM
2 minute read
Manches' Oxford office and Mills & Reeve have broken off talks about a potential tie-up.
The two firms entered into discussions last year that could have seen Manches' entire 25-partner Oxford office joining the top 50 national firm.
The deal would have handed Mills & Reeve its seventh UK office alongside Birmingham, Cambridge, Leeds, London, Manchester and Norwich.
It is understood the talks broke down as a result of strategic differences in December 2009, after a number of meetings between the two firms.
Manches confirmed its ongoing commitment to all three of its offices in Oxford, London and Reading.
Manches London office head Louis Manches said: "We were approached a while ago by a firm interested in our Oxford office. The discussions are not proceeding."
Mills & Reeve managing partner Guy Hinchley added: "We had a series of positive meetings with [the Oxford partners] to explore mutual opportunities. It did not get as far as getting into discussions with Manches as a whole. In the end we weighed the pros and cons involving the scale of the acquisition and our strategic objectives and decided not to proceed."
News of the talks came after it emerged in September that Manches and Halliwells had held a series of discussions regarding a merger. The talks went as far as the due diligence stage before breaking down.
Manches, which has a strong family and private client team, saw revenue dip to £34.1m in 2008-09, down from £34.4m the previous year. Profits per equity partner (PEP) dropped by 7.9% to £209,000 from £227,000 in 2007-08.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKirkland, Paul Hastings, White & Case, Freshfields advise on Top German Deals
2 minute readBlocking of $14B Nippon US Steel Deal Will Not Dampen Japan-U.S. M&A, Lawyers Say
Milbank’s Capital Markets Partner Leaves for China’s Han Kun in Hong Kong
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250