CC cuts partner council and brings in measures to handle poor performers
Clifford Chance (CC) is set to make exiting underperforming partners easier for management as part of its plans to amend its governance structure. The proposed change to the partnership deed would see management removing partners' right to protest a termination notice through a vote of the partnership, giving the 17-member management committee, led by managing partner David Childs, the final say.
January 21, 2010 at 03:57 AM
2 minute read
CC considers move to make it easier to exit problem partners
Clifford Chance (CC) is set to make exiting underperforming partners easier for management as part of its plans to amend its governance structure.
The proposed change to the partnership deed would see management removing partners' right to protest a termination notice through a vote of the partnership, giving the 17-member management committee, led by managing partner David Childs, the final say.
As it stands, partners asked to leave following a poor performance review and a warning period can dispute management's decision by taking it to a vote of the partnership.CC is also proposing to shorten the warning period for under-performers from 12 months to between nine and 12 months.
As part of the same drive to improve partner performance, CC is planning to tighten its partner appraisal system by formalising an annual review process that will see partners across all offices appraised on the same criteria, including billing and business levels.
In March last year CC's management secured a vote from the partnership granting it temporary powers to override the partnership deed in order to cut its partner headcount as part of its restructuring. However, the powers, which were capped at a 15% reduction in global partner headcount, came to an end in July.
The governance change forms part of a number of proposals circulated to the partnership earlier this month by management. Other proposals already reported by Legal Week include the establishment of a nomination committee for practice group head and regional management elections.
CC began discussing changes to its governance in September with a number of amendments considered, including the possibility of cutting down the size of the management team. The firm has since decided to retain its current management structure.
However, the firm is proposing to cut down the number of seats on its partnership council from 12 to seven, with members elected by the global partnership rather than regionally. The firm is also proposing that no two members from the same geographical region sit on the council, which is currently headed by senior partner Stuart Popham.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Six Korean Firm Bae, Kim & Lee Boosts Disputes Offering With Former A&O Lifer
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose, Greenberg Traurig, White & Case Lead Major Deals in Asia
Aviation Attorney and Pilot Analyzes Jeju Air Crash, Potential Litigation Issues
Shoosmiths Hires Two Locke Lord London Partners as Part of a Six-Strong IP Team
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250