Barclays litigation team pilots move to build links with chambers
Barclays' in-house litigation team is tightening its relationships with the Bar, with the bank asking select chambers for flexible billing arrangements and value-added services. The banking giant is calling on chambers to take on work using alternative billing arrangements such as conditional fee agreements (CFAs) and fixed fees, as well as providing additional services such as secondees and dedicated client teams in return for more work.
January 27, 2010 at 07:04 PM
3 minute read
Barclays looks to forge law firm-style relationships with the Bar
Barclays' in-house litigation team is tightening its relationships with the Bar, with the bank asking select chambers for flexible billing arrangements and value-added services.
The banking giant is calling on chambers to take on work using alternative billing arrangements such as conditional fee agreements (CFAs) and fixed fees, as well as providing additional services such as secondees and dedicated client teams in return for more work.
The unusual move, which has already seen Barclays strengthening links with sets including Fountain Court and 3 Verulam Buildings, is evidence of corporate clients trying to build more sophisticated, chambers-level relationships with the Bar.
Barclays is in talks with six further sets, including Outer Temple Chambers, which has already signed up to provide training to in-house counsel on criminal law next year. The sets are expected to present proposals to Barclays' director of litigation and special investigations Jonathan Peddie.
Peddie, who is spearheading the initiative and plans to put most of the schemes in place this year, stressed that, unlike the bank's relationships with law firms, there will be no fixed panel or contracts in place. The non-exclusive relationships will see chambers agree to a set of principles.
Peddie said: "We are talking to chambers about a more sophisticated utilisation but it's not a closed list. It's about developing stronger client-focus cultures within chambers, concentrating work where we already have strong relationships and making fuller use of innovative sets we don't know well enough. It's value-driven, not about costs. Cost advantages naturally flow, but only if you treat a relationship as something to grow on a two-way basis. We are asking sets what they can do for us."
Commenting on Barclays' move, Fountain Court's director of clerking, Alex Taylor, said: "This is an innovative initiative from Barclays, which has started to progress into building more sophisticated relationships with the Bar. It is an exciting project for us because I feel we can learn so much from such a good client. This experience will help us not only with our highly-valued relationship with Barclays, but with other clients as well."
Last year Barclays' in-house litigation team clamped down on value from its advisers, pushing panel solicitors for more flexible billing arrangements and seeking top-level secondees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSlaughter and May Leads As Government Buys Back £6 Billion of Military Homes
2 minute readLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Trending Stories
- 1'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 2Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 3Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 4Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
- 5Burr & Forman, Smith Gambrell & Russell Promote More to Partner This Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250