Norton Rose takes all staff off flexible working scheme
Norton Rose is ending the flexible working scheme it introduced last year in a bid to avoid redundancies. The City law firm is taking all staff off its Flex scheme from tomorrow (29 January), several months earlier than planned, as a result of an uptake in activity levels.
January 27, 2010 at 07:04 PM
2 minute read
UK firm calls time on Flex scheme as work levels begin to recover
Norton Rose is ending the flexible working scheme it introduced last year in a bid to avoid redundancies.
The City law firm is taking all staff off its Flex scheme from tomorrow (29 January), several months earlier than planned, as a result of an uptake in activity levels.
The firm estimates that it saved roughly 100 jobs through the high-profile scheme which, at its height in summer 2009, saw around 600 staff working reduced hours.
The Flex scheme, introduced on 1 May last year and intended to last for the full financial year, saw fee earners and support staff working either a four-day week or taking an extended sabbatical, with activity levels monitored weekly by a committee including practice heads, senior management and human resources staff.
Chief executive Peter Martyr (pictured) told Legal Week: "We have taken the view to repay our loyal staff by cutting Flex as early as possible. Although we are not out of the woods yet as far as the recession is concerned, we have been monitoring things on a micro and macro level and the previous quarter showed more activity across the firm.
"We told staff that if we could drop it early, we would. We think that we have done the right thing."
The news comes as the firm puts the final touches on its merger with Australian outfit Deacons, which went live at the beginning of this month. A 12-member supervisory board has been finalised, which includes three seats for Deacons partners and nine for Norton Rose.
The board, which is overseen by chairman Stephen Parish, comprises Sydney corporate partner Adrian Ahern; Perth banking partner Chris Mcleod; Melborne arbitration partner Cameron Harvey; London corporate finance partners Raj Karia, Robin Brooks and Martin Scott; Germany chief Alexander von Bergwelt; Amsterdam chief Ep Hannema; tax head Louise Higginbottom; antitrust head Martin Coleman; financial institutions chief James Bateson; and Middle East senior partner Campbell Steedman.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Axiom-Ince: SFO Charges Five, Including Former Head, Following Investigation
3 minute readSDT Upholds SLAPP Claim Against Osborne Clarke Partner Advising Nadhim Zahawi
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250