Cobbetts lines up loans to avoid cash call after profits fall 44% to £9.4m
Cobbetts has negotiated loan facilities of £10.5m in an effort to avoid a partner cash call The firm renegotiated a bank loan facility with RBS in Janaury, which comprises a £2.5m overdraft and a £6.5m term loan secured by a debenture over the assets of debt recovery business Incasso - a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cobbetts.
February 10, 2010 at 09:37 AM
2 minute read
Cobbetts has negotiated loan facilities of £10.5m in an effort to avoid a partner cash call
The firm renegotiated a bank loan facility with RBS in Janaury, which comprises a £2.5m overdraft and a £6.5m term loan secured by a debenture over the assets of debt recovery business Incasso – a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cobbetts.
The firm also borrowed £1.5m through a short-term asset-based leasing arrangement in order to pay January's tax bill and avoid carrying out a cash call.
Cobbetts managing partner Michael Shaw (pictured) said: "The debenture was granted by the discrete debt recovery business, Incasso, by way of security for the facility. It was not considered appropriate for the debenture to be taken over Cobbetts in view of the modest level of the funding."
He added: "By increasing borrowings in this way, we have avoided calling on partners to increase the capital within the business, and are on course to reduce borrowings significantly in the 2009-10 accounting period."
The firm's recently-filed limited liability partnership (LLP) filings also reveal that the firm's highest-paid member took home £257,000 in 2008-09, a 35% reduction on the figure of £394,000 in 2007-08. Total profit, before members' remuneration, was £9.4m – 44% down on the previous year's figure of £16.9m.
Profit-sharing arrangements were varied by reducing the fixed element of each partner's remuneration.
The firm's net debt increased by 60% over the year to £11.5m, while total cash at the bank and cash in hand decreased by 87% to £78,000, according to the filings with Companies House.
Staff numbers fell by 53 to 588 over the year, resulting in a 14.4% reduction in staff costs to £20.9m.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFreshfields' Former Senior Partner Braham Knighted in New Year’s Honours
3 minute readTrio Of Firms Bag Roles In JSW Energy’s $1.5B Acquisition In India
Brazilian Firms Demarest, BMA, TozziniFreire Elevate Lawyers to Partner
Trending Stories
- 1Data Breach Lawsuit Against Byte Federal Among 1,500 Targeting Companies in 2024
- 2Counterfeiters Ride Surge in Tabletop Games’ Popularity, Challenging IP Owners to Keep Up
- 3Health Care Data Breach Class Actions Saw December Surge in NY Courts
- 4Florida Supreme Court Disbars 3, Suspends 11, Reprimands 1 in Final Disciplinary Order of 2024
- 5Chief Justice Roberts Ends Year With Defense Against 'Illegitimate' Attacks on Judiciary
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250